Your Questions
Your Questions
Q: Dr. Eppley, In 2017 I had double jaw surgery, bottom was moved backwards and top moved forward. After time has passed my cheeks have gotten really saggy and my midface is unbalanced. I am wondering if maybe cheek inplants can sort of give me more fullness in the mid face and also add structure, to kind of lift my saggy cheeks.
A: One of the well known adverse effects of a LeFort osteotomy can be loss of cheek fullness and/or the development of excessive persistent fullness in the lower cheek area. (due to the wide subperiosteal tissue release needed to perform the procedure) Such effects can become more apparent also based on the type of upper jaw movement, particularly in larger forward advancements. Increasing the bony support of the cheekbones can help but the key to doing so is to get the right style and size of cheek implants in place. What you really lack is a combination of undereye and high cheekbone structural defieciency. This is where a custom infraorbital-malar cheek implant style works best. Standard cheek implants do not have the ability to provide this type of bony footprint coverage.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I underwent a buccal lipectomy about a year and a half ago and I was very dissatisfied with the result. Searching for a solution to my problem, I recently read your article on buccal lipectomy reversal with dermal-fat grafts and was interested. I would like to know if you did more cases similar to the one reported in the article and if you had good results. In addition, I would like to know the chances of graft necrosis in the procedure.
A: As you may know the most common treatment for any form of facial fat loss/atrophy would be fat injections. But in the handful of cases where patients have specifically requested non-injectable dermal-fat graft for buccal fat restoration have done well and have not suffered fat loss/necrosis. That is not a surprise to me as the typical size of the buccal fat pad is in the 3ccs range, which translates into a small dermal-fat graft, which usually does well anywhere on the face when implanted.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I would be interested in finding out about fixing the shape of my skull (a bit pointy towards the top and flat on the back). See the pictures attached. I just found out about Dr. Eppley’s work here online and am impressed by the results from the photos I saw. Please contact me and let me know.
A: Thank you for your inquiry and sending your picture. From the front view reduction of the pointy head is usually done by reducing the height of the sagittal crest. (point) The flat back of the head (which I know by your description but have not seen a picture of it, is usually treated by a custom skull implant.
Both the posterior sagittal crest reduction and the augmentation of the flat upper back of the head can be done through the same small incision.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, The back left side of my head is a little smaller than the right side and I never really realized there was a difference until now. I’m now 25 years old and I’m extremely self conscious about it. It’s extremely noticeable when I turn my head to the side, my whole left side of my face looks smaller because of this. I believe it’s called plagiocephaly but I have never talked to a Dr about it. At my age is it too late to have a surgery because I know you’re supposed to catch this early on?
A: Treating adult plagiocephaly head shape concerns with a custom skull implant can be done at anytime in an adult’s life. You are referring to non-surgical helmet therapy for head reshaping which must be done in the 24 months after birth.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I’m curious about your testicular implant surgeries. I have used metal testicle stretchers (1-10 lbs at a time), and have done saline infusions into my scrotum (up to 2.5L of 5% dextrose saline) and have learned about your surgeries recently. I know of people that inject silicone into their scrotum, but the danger and permanence of silicone injection in that area has turned me away. Hearing about your work with silicone implants, that can ‘wrap’ around the existing testicles has piqued my curiosity, so I figured I’d reach out with some questions. On the page you describe the implant process, you mention the largest implants you’ve done have been 7cm in length. Doing some rudimentary measurements, one of my testicles is about 2 inches, and the other is about 1.5. Pulling my scrotal skin outwards, and measuring from the base of my scrotum the measurement is a bit over 8inches, and pulling apart the skin to the sides reads a bit over 7 inches. I was curious whether you considered doing larger testicular implants, and whether with large amount of ‘space’ I have what size I might be able to accommodate. I’m also curious about how many of these types of procedures (or similar) you’ve done. I know there’s not really such thing as a ‘safe’ surgery, but I was also curious what the risks of something like this may be.
Thanks for taking the time to read this, and for any information you may have for me,
A: In answer to your testicle implant questions:
1) Whether you can safely handle an implant size greater than 7 cms I can not say. It may be so. But external measurements by stretching scrotal skin do not really tell what the displacement effects may be with an internally spaced volume, particularly when there are two implants. But with your history of stretching and saline infusions it may be possible. In this situations/requests I have to be prepared for what happens if the size chosen (let’s say 8 cms) does not fit in surgery. Thus a backup smaller implant size must be available.
2) When it comes to specifically wrap around testicle implants the only complications I have ever seen in when the testicle slips out of the implant after surgery. (which has occurred twice and occurs early before encapsulation occurs) What I have learned from that experience is to place a suture between the closed end of the implant up through the bottom end of the testicular capsule and used that pull it into the implant and then tie it down. That will prevent that potential displacement issue.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I just had a quick question regarding surgeries you preform. Is it possible to get both clavicle reduction surgery, and rib removal surgery for a smaller waist, at the same time? Additionally, does liposuction of the waist work to get a smaller waist measurement for patients who are skinny or normal weight, and how much does it tend to reduce the waist by?
A: Typically shoulder reduction and rib removal surgery is not performed at the same time. That is a difficult recovery that few people would be advised to undergo. In exceptional circumstances if the patient has accompanying support it may be possible in selected patients.
Liposuction of the waistline alone in skinny patients would not be expected have any real reduction effect of the waistline.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, My face is severely lopsided and my lower jaw does not sit exactly in place. It is very noticeable when looking in the mirror or inverted photos of myself. One of my eyes is also larger than the other and one of my cheeks has much more skin/fat than the other as well.
A: Thank you for your inquiry and sending your pictures. What you have is a right facial asymmetry, which affects the entire right side of your face, but in which the greatest asymmetry is inferior or lower. Your chin/jaw deviation is the most severe component of your facial asymmetry which becomes less so as it proceeds superiorly. (mouth corner is lower, nostril is lower and wider, cheek is fuller, upper and lower eye corners are lower with upper lid ptosis)
All of the issues above the jawline can be improved by soft tissue procedures which can be determined by what is seen externally. The chin/jawline, however, has undoubtably a major bony component to it. This will need to be assessed and treatment planed by first getting a 3D CT scan of your face.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I have several questions about sagittal ridge reduction surgery:
– Is a CT scan required if only burring will be performed (e.g., no implant)?
– Do all sagittal ridge reductions require placement of a drain? If possible, I would like to avoid a second scar from the drain tube, even if it means a slightly longer recovery.
– What determines the length of the incision? Is it the amount of distance you need to sweep the burr left-to-right (laterally)? The length of the ridge (posterior-anterior)? The curvature of the skull? The tightness of the scalp?
– What determines the shape of the incision? For posterior ridge reduction, I noticed that some of your incisions have more of an arc (u-shape), while others are closer to a straight line. Why the difference, and does the patient have a choice of incision shape?
– Are dissolving sutures used, or does the patient need to return to your clinic to have the sutures removed?
– Will hair grow through the scar tissue?
– For those who do opt for an implant, how often does the implant’s edge become visible once the swelling resolves? For horseshoe-shaped implants, I assume that it’s difficult to get the prefabricated implant to transition seamlessly into the burred crown region.
– Have you done any off-label testing of verteporfin to minimize scar formation? This could be a game changer if it’s effective!
A: In answer to your sagittal ridge skull reduction questions:
1) A preoperative CT scan is not usually needed if no implant is required.
2) All sagittal ridge skull reductions require a drain which is removed in 24 hours and leaves no visible scar when healed.
3) The length of the scalp incision is based on how much access is needed to properly do the reduction. I always start out very small and then enlarge as needed.
4) The shape of the incision largely follows the hair pattern. I have no preference if it is straight or curved. It heals very well either way.
5) Small dissolvable sutures are used which don’t need to be removed.
6) Hair rarely if ever grows through a scar. The real question is whether the hair will grow right up against the edge of the pencil thin scar…which it usually does.
7) Generally implant edging is either non-existant or very minimal…as has been revealed many times in the patient that provides the most severe test of that effect…the male who shaves his head. It is usually not a problem because I lok for it and adjust the implant edges as needed.
8) I would not use Verterporfin in humans based purely on studies performed in mice. How that translates to humans is not yet known…not so much in regards to its benefits but rather what the adverse side effects with its use may be. Why take an operation which typically has superb scars and risk it for a very minimal benefit. I shall await what incisions in humans reveal with its use.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley,
•Is the Rhinoplasty with an open or closed scar? My previous surgery was closed and would really prefer not having another scar if possible.
•How far into the sides of my head is the incision for the forehead advancement? Also does the “zig-zag incision effect the shape of the hairline result or does it just mask the scar slightly.
A: 1) Any efforts at a secondary rhinoplasty require an open approach due to altered anatomy and scar. But that answer depends on what exact further nose changes you are seeking.
2) The hairline advancement goes into the upper temporal region. The zigzag portion is along the frontal hairline part, once into the temporal region it becomes straightline The role of the zigzag incision is for the frontal hairline where a straightline scar looks more unnatural.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I had a Zygomantic Sandwich Osteotomy 1 year ago. I want to reverse it and not do anything else. My face became somehow “bloated” and I don’t like it. I also had SARPE. I know, that a genioplasty would also improve my face, but that is not a concern at this moment.
A: Bone rarely grows over the ZSO osteotomy fixation site. And whatever bone growth around the plates and screws that is going to occur has already occurred by now. Reversal of ZSO involves cutting out the healed bone graftand putting the cheekbone back from whence it came.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, For the pectoral implants, I have a question. I still have fatty tissue and glandular tissue on my male breast. It must first be removed before the pectoral inplants is inserted?
A: Gynecomastia reduction surgery can be performed concurrently with pectoral implant placement if the patient so desires.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, So I would like to place custom medpor cheek implants because I have read that over time it will adhere to the bone but I have also read that the risk of infection is higher than with silicone implants but I also read that silicone implants can cause bone erosion over time and that they were more likely to move, so I would like to know according to you which material is best for long term cheek augmentation without surgery revision and without the implant moving (for example for 60 years).
A: In answer to your custom cheek implant questions:
1) Every implant material has their own advantages and disadvantages, there is no one best material.
2) While Medpor does allow tissue ingrowth, it is considerably more expensive than silicone, does have a higher infection rate and is more difficult to revise/modify/remove.
3) Solid silicone remains the primary material I use for any custom facial implant as it is more economical, has a lower infection risk and is much easer to revise/modify/remove should that be necessary.
4) It is a myth that silicone facial implants can move or migrate after they are healed in place. It is true that if you don’t screw them into place during surgery the size of the pocket needed to place any implant can allow them move then due to one slippery surface on another. (but not once healed) Thus the value of immediate screw fixation.
5) It is not realistic to believe that any implant placed in the face or body will never have a risk of revision. The most common reason for revision are aesthetic in nature not due to infection or ‘migration’. There is no guarantee that someone will like the aesthetic result or may feel the need to make some change in their size or shape, whether that is 60 days or 60 years after their placement.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I might need to have a dental implant in the future. Will the jawline implants make this more complicated/impossible?
My reasoning for wanting a sliding genioplasty in addition to implants is that in case my implants get infected and have to be removed, at least I would have improvement from the sliding genioplasty. I think during our Skype consultation, you mentioned I wouldn’t get any width increase from the genioplasty. I did however stumble across the article below where you mention it is possible. Can you please explain why you believe I wouldn’t not be able to get width increase? (https://exploreplasticsurgery.com/the-step-off-deformity-in-a-sliding-genioplasty/?doing_wp_cron=1618182204.5073790550231933593750)
Would the sliding genioplasty create visible irregularities/ step-off? If so, is there anything that can be done in the future to improve this?
A: In answer to your dental implant and sliding genioplasty questions:
1) The concern with dental implants is not the implants themselves but with the local anesthesia used to perform them. The implantologist needs to know the jawline implant is there so they do not inadvertently inject into the implant space and cause an infection of it.
2) If you are combining custom jaw angles that are designed to merge into the sliding genioplasty, this is how you add width to the chin.
3) Like #2 that is the value of the custom jaw angle/line implants to also cover over the stepoffs from the sliding genioplasty.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I had a closed rhinoplasty in 2015. The surgeon did a good job but its not perfect. My columella is cooked and my nasal tip points down. My facial muscles are also very strong and make my nose very wide when I smile. I am hoping this can all be repaired with a premaxillary implant.
Please review the attached pictures and let me know what you think.
A: Thank you for your inquiry and sending your pictures to which I can say:
1) The purpose of a premaxillary implant is to bring forward the recessed lower pyrifom aperture area which your pictures show would be of benefit as evidenced by your less than 90 degree nasolabial angle.
2) Such a midface implant would work in conjunction with a secondary tip rhinoplasty to bring increased tip rotation through caudal septal resection, lateral crural spanning sutures and infratip cartilage resection. Straightening of the crooked columella along with augmentation of the collapsed right alar rim requires a septal graft harvest for the cartilage needed to do so.
3) The dynamic nasal flare that occurs with smiling is not the purpose of the premaxillary implant nor will it address that issue by itself. The placement of bi-alar spanning suture between nostril bases MAY provide some improvement in that regard. The other option is to place a microscrew in the lateral aspect of the premaxillary implant and place a permanent suture between it and the nostril base above.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I wanted to reach out given your extensive experience with lip surgery and see if I would be a good candidate for a procedure that I have had in mind for a while. I have a thin upper lift with a bit of a blurry vermillion border, which makes the lift procedure a bit tricky because I would not want to necessarily have more volume in my upper lift, just to lift it a bit since I feel it is too low. I also have something that I would like to ask you regarding my lower lift, I had a chin implant put a couple years ago and I believe that because of the projection of the implant, that pushed my lower lip upwards a bit, so bringing it down a little could also be good not only from an aesthetic point of view but as a functional improvement as well since I feel that I have to force it down a bit when I open my mouth. Thank you!
A: If I understand your inquiry and goal explanations correctly….the lower lip lift (vermilion advancement) is straightforward as that is the only way to lower the vermilion border on the lower lip. For the upper lip the options are either a subnasal lip lift (under the nose) or a vermilion advancement. (at the vermilion-skin border) By definition both lip procedures will create more vermilion show. So to determine which upper lip procedure is best for you I would need to know more specifics about your exact upper lip reshaping goals. I suspect the vermilion advancement is the better procedure. But that depends on whether you want to affect part or all of the upper lip.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I’m becoming concerned about the muscle reattachment after the bony chin reduction and if it will cause any types of anomalies such as the chin muscle “balling up”, the bottom lip becoming lax or the chin muscles just simply not returning to their normal function. I do feel I have an overactive muscle in my chin based on dimpling when I contract the muscle and I’m wondering if this will increase my risk for postoperative issues. Could you tell me what I should reasonably expect in terms of these complications? I would just like to make sure I’m managing my exceptions and weighing the risks appropriately.
A: The mentalis muscle is always reattached so postoperative phenomenon such as ‘balling up’, lower lip laxity or other chin muscles not working are not issues I have ever seen after chin reduction surgery. Any preoperatve chin dimpling/overactive mentalis muscle is probably not going to change for better or worse.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, Will intraoral chin resuspension work for the loose chin tissue that I now have after mini V line surgery?
A: You suffer now from chin pad ptosis/’extra’ tissue from the loss of bone support and the wide stripping off of tissues to perform the chin osteotomy. Simply put you have too much soft tissue for the bone volume underneath it. Intraoral chin suspension is not going to be effective alone and one is certainly not going to perform an external wedge excision of redundant soft tissue chin pad tissues due to the scar. Unless you are prepared to put back the lost bone support, which would be the antithesis of what your original aesthetic goals were, I do not believe anything is going to be effective.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, How accurate is computer imaging of the face in regards to the final outcomes achieved?
A: The role of computer imaging in facial surgery is frequently misunderstood by patients. Computer imaging is done to help determine what the patient’s aesthetic goals are. It is a method of interactive visual communication to help your surgeon understand what your specific facial reshaping goals are. It is not necessarily a completely accurate predictor of the final outcome nor is it intended to be. In facial structural (bone) surgery it is a critical part of the preoperative workup because the patient is going to a look that they have never had and I have to know what exact look they are trying to achieve. Conversely In facial rejuvenative (soft tissue) surgery, computer imaging is less frequently done or of great value because the patient’s goals are well known as they are just trying to go back to achieve a look they are already know. (look younger) In addition such soft tissue facial imaging is prone to shape and shadowing distortions that introduce limitations to any visual value that it has.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I do have a couple of follow up questions for you in regards to the total jawline augmentation that we discussed
- 1) Are you able to combine a sliding genioplasty with a single piece custom jaw wrap around implant or can it only be combined with 2 lateral custom jaw angle implants?
- 2) If the first instance is possible, how will the design process of the implant happen given that a CT scan of what my chin will be like wouldn’t exist yet?
- 3) I am also considering hd liposuction (not facial or neck related) with another doctor, and I am wondering how far apart should the surgeries be. If I were to do the lipo first, how long would I need to wait before you would want to operate on me?
A :In answer to his jawline augmentation questions:
1) A sliding genioplasty can be combined with a single piece custom jawline implant.
2) You make the exact movements of the chin on the scan and then design a jawline implant around it. It is a not uncommon combination.
3) I would separate them by at least 6 weeks.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I hope this email finds you well. I am interested in a non-custom chin implant of about 7.5mm, or whichever size you would recommend for my face. I also have a bit of asymmetry where my chin skews toward the left and is especially visible from the front, which I’m also hoping to correct. Based on these details and the photos attached what do you recommend?
A: Thank you for your inquiry and sending your pictures. I would probably use a Mandibular Glove style chin implant of which the size options are either 6.0 or 8.0mm. When it comes to the asymmetry all that can be done with a standard chin implant is to deliberately shift it more to the right…which may lessen the asymmetry. How much to shift it to the right would depend on assessing a panorex x-ray and determining preop how much the central point of the chin is deviated to the left.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, Are there any risks to a genioplasty revision not present in the original procedure (or risks that rise when you do a revision, versus the original)? I.e.: mentalis sag, infection, step off
- About how many secondary genioplasties have you done? (can be in the last few years, or whichever time period, but let me know which one you are using). When was the most recent secondary genioplasty you did?
- In your patients who undergo secondary genioplasty: has anyone ever experienced complications, and if so what kind? Have you ever had issues removing the original hardware?
- Does secondary genioplasty become more difficult to perform/get good outcomes from the further along post-op you are from the original procedure? (maybe because bone grows around the hardware, for ex.). How far along post-op are secondary genioplasty patients, usually?
- is it riskier/less risky to do a submental incision, versus intraoral?
Thank you!
A: In answer to your secondary genioplasty questions:
1) The risks are identical to the first genioplasty.
2) I so bout 10 to 12 secondary genioplasties a year.
3) Unless bicortical screws are used for fixation removal of existing plates and screws is not a problem.
4) Secondary genioplasties are done weeks to years after the original procedure. It is obviously easier to at weeks after surgery rather years but they can be successfully done in the short or long-term.
5) You can not do a sliding genioplasty through a submental skin incision….unless the goal was a reduction and not additional forward bone movement.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, Hi my 14 year old son has a great complex.
He has uncorrected brachiocephaly. The pediatricians told us that it would correct itself but it did not.
At what age could I place the 3D implant?
A: Once past puberty I think it could be done anytime that the patient feels that it is aesthetically bothersome.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley,Thank you for getting back to me. I truly appreciate your team’s time, as I know that Dr. Eppley is renowned in his field and ahead of the curve. I have one last question for him, so that I can consider my options and then decide which one I want to schedule a consultation for. My question is: Is it possible to do a bone reduction by itself, without doing a temporal reduction, or is it necessary to do the temporal reduction first, to get to the bone?
A: When it comes to temporal reduction, if the intent is to reduce the width or convexity of the side of the head, the most significant effect come from muscle removal and also can be done in a scarless manner from an incision placed behind the ear. If one wants to do temporal bone reduction this requires an incision up on the side of the head. That more visible scar tradeoff and the negligible effect that temporal bone reduction has due to its thinness (1 to 2mms only) is why temporal bone reduction by itself has little benefit and is not usually done as a standalone procedure or before muscle removal is done. This doesn’t mean it can’t be done but is not an effective head width reduction technique in my experience.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I have egg shaped eyes and I would like a more almond shaped kind of look sorta like Megan Fox’s eyes. I would just like for my eyes to be smaller instead of big and I was wondering if that was a thing or not. Also do you guys do the cat eye/fox eye lift ? My last and final question is am I eligible for a lip reduction I have big lips and I would like them super small.
A:The main reason you have ‘big’ eyes is that the bone around the eyes is not well developed, thus the eyeballs stick out more. (known as pseudoexophthalmos) No form of eye corner or eyelid reshaping will work in this situation because of the lack of adequate periorbital bone structures. As for the lips, while they can be made smaller they can not be made ‘super small.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am a patient who would like to inquire about reversal otoplasty surgery for over-corrected ears. I have attached some photographs.
I had otoplasty 10 years ago, and I regret it. At the time I was young and insecure about my appearance, but have since come to the opinion that my original ears, although they stuck out a bit, were suited to my face.
Unfortunately my ears seem to have been operated on badly – they are now harshly shaped and too close to my head, especially the left one. They are also different to each other, one is big and one is small, and the right ear has a sharp ridge of cartilage on the anti helix.
I am not looking for perfection, and know it is not possible after a failed surgery. However, I would like, if possible, to regain a more natural look – with the mid to upper part of my ears to come outwards a bit more – so that there is a more rounded appearance from face on. And for the ear shapes to match each other better.
I hope this is enough information and the photos are suitable, I’d really appreciate your thoughts on my situation. Also an estimate to the cost of this type of surgery would be helpful.
Many thanks for your time,
A: The reason your ears were over corrected is that you had the wrong otoplasty procedure. You had a well defined antihelical fold originally and the proper technique was a conchal setback rather than antihelical fold sutures. Now the outer helical rim is pulled behind the antihelical fold. For a reverse otoplasty the antihelical folds need to be released and an interpositional cartilage graft placed. You are correct in that they still won’t be perfect but they will look better.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am very very stressed about a situation i am confronted with. I have put medpor jaw angle implants actually and i don’t like the way it looks on my face and i would like to replace them.
However I read in several web sites that it’s impossible to replace, others say possible but difficult, i m very scared about it, am i obliged to keep them all my Life ? What solution can i havé ?
Thank you doctor
A: They can be safely removed and/or replaced. I have done it many times.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, My wife is due to have breast enlargement surgery done but, because of Covid 19, her surgeon has put it back until April/May 2021. My wife really wants 1500cc (Saline), but in your country, we only do 800/900cc. Her surgeon has asked us, if we can find a manufacture or practice that would do a 1500cc saline bag (empty) and she would be happy to fill it. Would this be possible, and could we purchase them from you if possible?
Thank you
A:I am not an implant manufacturer or distributor. But if it is saline breast implants you take an 800cc implant and overfill it to 1500cc…if the tissue stretch will permit that amount of volume expansion n a first time breast augmentation patient. This is how it is commonly done I would assume your surgeon knows this information.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, in the past I consulted with you regarding custom facial implants. We agreed I should wait until after my jaw surgery to have them done.
I am now 3 months from my jaw surgery and had 2 questions.
1.How long should i wait for maximum saftey after the jaw surgery and placing the implants?
2. Could the add pressure from the implant increase the risk of jaw relapse from the surgery?
3. Should the plates be taken out if i only need angle of the jaw implants.
A:I answer to your post orthognathic surgery questions:
1) I would wait a full 6 months after your orthognathic surgery to allow for full bony healing and any settling of your result.
2) Jaw angle implants may cause some bone imprinting and/or bony overgrowth but not jaw relapse.
3) No plates need to be removed for the placement of jaw angle or jawline implants.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, a while ago I had asked you about cheekbone surgery and expressed the concern about sagging. After some time I am now thinking if it could be an option for me to do the cheekbones surgery to reduce the width and then subsequently get cheek implants in order to take care of the sagging and any loss of frontal cheek projection, if it occurs. However I still came across a couple of people telling me that ‘some other people they contacted’ did not get any improvement in sagging despite getting a cheek implant. I wanted to confirm from you if this has been your experience or this has come under your knowledge. I am willing to take the long road of getting cheekbone reduction and then cheek implants to do away with their portruding width, but I want to know if it is true that even getting implants afterwards the reduction does not do away with the sagging.
Also, I won’t like implants exactly where I get the cheekbones reduced, since then it would be of no meaning. I want to reduce the cheekbone width, but maintain the projection and do away with the sagging with an implant on the front later. Please let me know your insights and guide me one more time, I’d be really grateful, thank you!
A: Like all types of upper midface implants, their lifting effects are limited and are related to their size and placement location. The midface implants that are most likely to. have any lifting effect are those that are placed through a lower eyelid incision where the cheek tissues are lifted on top of them during closure. It is a fallacious concept that any type of cheek implant placed intraorally would have a lifting effect unless they were massive in size.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, “Concerning the implant design process, glad to see previous implants are helpful to anticipate results, would pictures before my implants be helpful also? Its a few years/few pounds back admittedly.
I see 2 design rounds are built into the process, how does someone accurately give feedback on a 3D model knowing its under soft tissue? Is there a way to include corresponding images of my current face and implants so I can toggle between the differences of the new implant and what the new implant improves upon? That would be the best for me to visualize, would be pretty important for me to understand.”
A: In answer to your custom facial implant questions:
1) Pre-design imaging is always done to set the patient’s aesthetic goals. You have to know what you are aiming for when making an implant design.
2) 3D implant designing is not an exact science as no one can accurately predict what will or will not show through the overlying soft tissues. It is NOT done by making a design and then painting the soft tissues over them to see what it will look like as that technology does not yet exist. That would be invaluable if it did exist and would take out all of the guess work and uncertainties of the process.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana

