Your Questions
Your Questions
Q: Dr. Eppley, This is a strange question but is it possible to get donor grafts from the part of the head that isn’t considered a donor area? I know your average person has around 8K hair grafts available from the DONOR area, but if someone wanted to access the grafts from the other areas, would this be technically possible?
Say there was a person that wanted a significant beard transplant and this person was much taller than the vast majority of people. They would prefer to take grafts from the non donor areas of their head because they are much taller than everyone around them, they would like to be able to conceal their scar or FUE procedure more effectively since very few people would see the top of their heads. They understand that FUT and FUE procedures nowadays can go undetected with good scar rejuvenation but still they would rather have the scars placed in a more undetectable area. They completely understand that non donor areas are labeled such because there is the risk that they will dissipate with progressive male hair pattern baldness and they are completely aware of this risk because they are already on balding medications such as finasteride and have no significant history of baldness in the family.
Would a situation like this be reason enough to oblige to their request of taking hairs from where they want:non donor area on top of head? or is there some physical reason why something like this may not be possible.
A: The simple answer to your question is that there is not a technical reason that the harvest site for hair transplants can not be taken from anywhere on the head. The reason the back of the head is used is two-fold; that is where most of the available hair is and it is hair that is theoretically programmed to last a lifetime for many men.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in revision rhinoplasty. I had a rib graft placed last year and now it is quite deviated. I want to straighten my nose and it should be a bit higher. What I don’t understand is why the rib graft was ok in the beginning and now it has deviated so much. Can you morselize the deviated part and put it back in. Will the morselized parts be healed like bone does? Will the nose be deviated again? If I go with a nasal implant instead of the rib graft, will it have any chance to deviate again? And will you have to harvest ear cartilage for the nose tip or you can utilize the cartilage that they used in the previous surgery?
A: It is not rare that a rib graft to the nose will eventually develop some deviation. This is a function of its natural curved shape and the memory of its cartilage shape. No matter how the rib graft is harvested it is rare to ever get a perfectly straight piece. As a result it must be carved to be straight. Depending upon how it is carved and where it was harvested along the subcostal margin, deviation can develop. Usually it appears quite soon after placement (a few months) but can be delayed in its appearance much later.
If the goal is a straight nose that is higher, then the rib graft should be replaced with a nasal implant in your revision rhinoplasty. A nasal implant will have more assured straightness since it is made straight. The tip of the nose and the columella, however, should remain cartilaginous, most likely using the rib graft which was removed.
If the goal is simply a straight nose with the same height then the rib graft should be configured into a diced cartilage graft for your revision rhinoplasty. This will eliminate ant risk of subsequent graft warping.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in a nasal hump reduction rhinoplasty. I have been looking into various options to achieve a straight nose in profile. As you’ll note from my photos this really is VERY minor – I’m under no illusion that this is not the case. Despite that I’m still very apprehensive about any work on the nose due to the complexity of it all and high revision rate. In particular I’m most concerned about affecting the nasofrontal angle negatively, and building up the bridge and radix too high whereby the eyes look closer together. The latter in particular is concerning as I’ll be having a midfacial operation that will widen the area even more. As such even a slight narrowing effect on the eyes could be exasperated later on with this next operation (infraorbital rim advancement).
As such, what would you recommend? As far as I can tell the position of my radix and nasofrontal angles are all relatively ideal. Would it be best then to shave down the dorsal hump? Or would building up the radix be ok given how minor it would be?
I look forward to your response.
A: My advice for you is not to have rhinoplasty surgery. The revision rate in rhinoplasty where patients have relatively major nasal shape issues is around 15%. When it comes to minor deformities the revision rate is higher…much higher. Contrary to popular perception, the smaller the nasal problem in many cases the harder it is to get it right. (perfect) The margin of error in minor aesthetic nose concerns is zero. It is just as easy to overcorrect in minor nasal shape issues as it is to get it perfect. By your own admission the position of the radix and nasofrontal angles is ideal and the hump is very minor. Be aware you will be scrutinizing the after surgery result just as carefully (if not more so) as the preoperative deformity. The chances of a successful outcome is no greater than an unsatisfactory one. Unfortunately rhinoplasty surgery is not a precise science and can not be controlled down to the level of a millimeter or two of structural changes.
In addition if you are going to being having infraorbital augmentation in the future, that facial change can potentially impact how you see other facial structures. Since that will be having a more major impact on your face I would defer any consideration of rhinoplasty until after that procedure.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in revision rhinoplasty. I have a problem with my deviated nose. This is the result of the rib cartilage placed in my nose which has become deviated. I had a nose job done in 2011 in Korea. It was fine at that time but now the deviation of the nose is very visible. My nose was originally not deviated like it is now
1. My question is whether it is possible to also have a nose surgery to remove that rib cartilage and replace with a good and straight implant. I just want a straight nose, the nose tip and wings are ok.
2. How much of the cartilage can you reuse and how much ear cartilage you need to harvest for the tip?
A: Unfortunately rib cartilage does have a tendency to warp in some patients creating a subsequent deviated nose. You have several revision rhinoplasty options considering that it is just the bridge part of the rib graft that is the issue. (and not the tip) These include the following:
- Remove the dorsal part of the rib graft only and replace with an implant
- Remove the deviated part of the rib graft, morselize it into small pieces and replace it as a diced cartilage graft without using an implant.
The decision between these two revision rhinoplasty choices depends on whether you just want to straighten the nose only or straighten it with further augmentation along the line of the bridge.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am seeking your professional opinion on how to treat my facial asymmetry. What do you think can be done? When I was 17 I underwent double jaw surgery to correct sleep apnea. I believe the right side of my face is lower than my left, my smile moves predominantly to the right, and my left eye is higher than the right. I do not know exactly what has caused this. I would like to know what is your diagnosis and what is a possible treatment. Thank you so much.
A: What you have is facial asymmetry with your right facial side being overall lower than that of the left side of you face. This is evident from the eyebrow down through the jawline. Given the fact that your facial asymmetry is not severe (I know it is to you but in the big picture it is not) any corrective procedure options should be considered from the perspective of what can be done with the lowest risk of aesthetic complications. (trading off one problem for another)
The most visible part of your facial asymmetry, as it is in a lot of facial asymmetry patients, is around the eye area. An endoscopic browlift on the right side with orbital floor augmentation (to raise up the eye) and lateral canthoplasty (change the location of the corner of the eye to a higher position) would make the greatest improvement in your facial asymmetry. Possibly a small cheek implant as well, I would leave your jawline along and there is no surgery that can be done to improve your smile asymmetry.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in a custom skull implant for my occipital augmentation revision. I came across this company in my research, Xilloc, which uses 3D printing technology along with CT scan image to manufacture patient specific implants using various materials.
They are on the verge of licensing and releasing a new technology for bone implants called CT-Bone. The patient’s implant is made by printing the material from calcium phosphate. Since calcium phosp is the primary constituent of natural bone, the implant fuses with the existing bone and the body integrates with it just as natural bone bone. The material can also be controlled to exhibit the same porosity as natural bone which may aid in vascularization. The future of cosmetic surgery looks so exciting with this technology. Scientists have also printed human organs like skin, liver and heart with 3d printers using human tissues. Hopefully it will be available in the US market as well.
I really like to have my surgery redone but i have many concerns and expectations that hopefully can be solved with newer and better options.
-100% biocompatible material
-custom fit
-no use of metal, including titanium screws
-desired cosmetic correction, smoothness and symmetry
Will you please look into this, Dr. Eppley.
With your expertise and skill and open-mindness I think anything is possible.
Thank you.
A: I am familiar with many custom skull implant technologies but there are multiple limiting factors. First many such porous hydroxyapatite or calcium phosphate materials tend to be form and less malleable. This creates challenges in surgical placement particularly for the aesthetic skull augmentation patient. A stiffer skull implant material requires a long incision to insert from ear to ear and a complete turn down of the scalp flap. Second, calcium phosphate materials can be more difficult to be made down to a smooth feathered edges. Thus there will be very palpable step offs at the edges of the implant when used as an onlay. This is not an issue for an inlay skull implant but is a huge aesthetic concern in an only skull implant down for aesthetic purposes. Third, the average cost of just the implant alone can be considerable. I don’t the know the exact cost of what this skull implant would be from this company but I would expect it to be more than new thousand dollars.
What you have to appreciate about this technology is that it is understandbly made for inlay bone defects and not primarily for onlay bone augmentations. It is geared for patients who had have skull defects from trauma and neurosurgery and are likely covered by insurance who can absorb the high cost of the implant.. For all of these reasons this may not be a custom skull implant technology for the aesthetic skull augmentation patient. This is a great example of while the technology is great the material chosen for it may limits its application in outer skull contouring/augmentation.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, Thank you for your rhinoplasty consultation and doing some computer imaging for me. Now that I am moving forward with actual rhinoplasty surgery can you send me the exact prediction images of my nose results? That will help me understand what I can expect after surgery.
A: There is no such thing as ‘exact prediction images’ in rhinoplasty or any other facial surgery. Prediction imaging is done as a communication method between the surgeon and the patient to determine what changes the patient desires and to make sure what may be possible is in line with the location and extent of changes the patient wants. They should not be interpreted as exact replicas that surgery may achieve nor are they guarantees of the result that would be obtained. They are estimates as to what the surgeon believes may happen but can not take into account the exact anatomic changes they would be done nor the effects of healing on these surgical changes. Therefore one should appreciate the term ‘prediction images’ when it comes to this important presurgical step. Fortunately it is usually more accurate than predicting the weather but the accuracy of rhinoplasty prediction imaging depends on the surgeon doing it.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in blepharoplasty surgery. My upper eyelids are very heavy and my lower eyelids have large bags under them. They make me look very tired and old. Attached are some eye pictures for your review and recommendations.
A: Thank you sending your pictures. Both your upper and lower eyelids show considerable tissue redundancies. The upper eyelids have a lot of extra skin and hooding (skin pushing down on the lashes) and the lower eyelids show tremendous herniation of the orbital fat pads. They are so pronounced that you can actually see all three fat pads under eye distinctly. (medial, central and lateral fat pads) You would benefit tremendously by both upper and lower blepharoplasties. What is unique about your lower eyelids is that your infraorbital bones are deficient so when the fat is taken away the bags will be gone but the eyes will look very shallow. For this reason that fat that would be removed actually needs to be repositioned so it is draped over the infraorbital bones to correct the tear troughs and infraorbital rim deficiency. So your lower eyelids fat pockets don’t need to be removed per se but they needs to be repositioned to get rid of the prominence and simultaneously correct the bone deficiencies.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in jawline reconstruction.I had upper and lower jaw surgery in 2012 where I was referred by my orthodontist and convinced that I needed it. However, they ruined my face and my bite has subsequently shifted. I would like a sharp jawline. Is it possible to get implants? Now, I cannot close my mouth properly and I have a weak chin.
A: While I do not know what you looked like previously, I can see now that you have a very steep mandibular plane (high jaw angles) and a recessed chin. From a jaw angle standpoint, vertical lengthening jaw angle implants are needed to drop the angle down and provide a more square angle shape. (not really square but closer to 110 degrees) Given that you have had prior jaw surgery (and I assume a sagittal split mandibular osteotomy, SSRO), your jaw angles are likely asymmetric and scarred. Custom jaw angle implants would be the ideal method for these unique jaw angle shapes.
For the chin the options would be either a sliding genioplasty or an implant as part of a total jawline implant which includes the jaw angles. Initially I would favor a sliding genioplasty because the vertical height of your chin needs to be reduced. But a custom implant may be designed this way also.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in jawline enhancement surgery doing a sliding genioplasty and jaw angle implants. Can the chin surgery be done at the same time as adding jaw angle implants? Would these custom implants be of a material that would be able to last a lifetime? I’m only 25 years old and have already gone through so much with my jaw and teeth that I wouldn’t want to go through with another surgery, but I am very unhappy with the way my face looks currently. I think that a sliding genioplasty with the jaw angle implants would be ideal because I agree that my chin looks rather long and I would rather adjust/fix it than add a chin implant. I know that this isn’t a consultation but what would be approximate cost be for these operations…10-12k or over 15k? I am currently covered under Tri-care but I know that these would be considered cosmetic and probably nothing would be covered with insurance.
A: In answer to your jawline enhancement surgery questions,
1) A sliding genioplasty and jaw angle implants can and should be done at the same time.
2) All facial implants are made of non-biodegradable silicone material which will last much longer than you and I will.
3) I thin the best approach in you would be a sliding genioplasty and vertical lengthening jaw angle implants. The most ideal approach for the implants is to have them custom made because you probably have some degree of asymmetry between your jaw angles given your prior surgery. But in the interest of cost, semi-custom vertical lengthening jaw angle implants can be used.
4) I will have my assistant pass along the exact cost of the surgery to you tomorrow.
5) Unfortunately your assumption is correct in that this would not be considered a medically necessity and would be viewed by TriCare as an elective cosmetic procedure.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in a revision rhinoplasty. My ENT performed a septoplasty in March of this year. He added cartilage from my septum to make my nose shorter and wider for breathing purposes. While my breathing has never been better, my appearance has changed, and I’m not a big fan of how my nose looks now. I would love to see if this is something that could be corrected.
A: By your description, you likely had spreader grafts placed in the middle vault and perhaps even alar batten grafts. These do successfully open up the internal valves and improve nasal breathing but can make the nose in some patients potentially wider.
The question is now how make your nose look better without recreating your breathing issues. This is most likely an augmentation approach for your revision rhinoplasty but I would need to see some pictures of your nose now to see what potentially could be done if anything. Given your improvement in breathing I would not recommend removing your spreading or batten grafts. Rather I would look at building up the bridge and tip of the nose somewhat to overcome the shorter and wider nose.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in a custom occipital implant. My head is obviously flat. I have been insecure about it since my teenage years. I am know in my late 20’s. I am interested in a custom occipital implant to make the back of my flat flat head perkier and rounder. I was wondering what the estimation of this procedure would be? I was also wondering, since you cut the hair/skin part of the back head, is the scar obvious (aside from hair covering it)? For example, if I were to show that area would the scar be obvious? Thank you. I look forward to your reply.
A: For augmentation of a flat back of the head, a custom occipital implant is the best method. It does require a scalp incision somewhere and that would depend on its size and location on the occiput. The scalp scar usually turns out very well particularly in women. If you shave your head the scar would be somewhat obvious but that is the situation you probably are not going to find yourself in. Great care is taken in aesthetic skull reshaping surgery to preserve hair follicles along and around the scalp incision.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I’m interested in a rhinoplasty procedure where the nostrils would be thinned out. Not brought closer to the center but actually having each nostril thinned out. However I can’t find any literature or examples on the Internet (I remember reading about it years ago though). Is this a thing and can it be done?
A: You may have trouble finding such a rhinoplasty procedure (nostril thinning) because it is very rarely done. That does not mean it can not be done just that one has to consider the aesthetic tradeoffs very carefully. True nostril thinning (not nostril narrowing or base width reduction) is done by excising skin right along the nostril rims. While this can thin the nostrils it will leave a fine line scar and may also create some increased columellar show in the side view. (alar rim retraction) This used to not be an uncommon procedure in cleft rhinoplasty. Thus a patient has to be selected very carefully for it so one does not simply trade off one nostril problem for a new set of nostril problems that may be worse than what one had initially. Scars along the edge of the nostril rim do not heal as favorably as other nasal locations.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in chin implant revision surgery. I had a chin implant placed a little over 4 years ago (I am 26 years old) because of a severe receding chin. I feel that it has always been placed in the wrong positions. Wing placed too high and Apex too low leading to too long of a face and still do not have a chin that looks normal from side view. I was wondering if I could get some information on possible consult such as fee and how much a chin implant revision surgery would be?
A: If the chin implant is positioned too low on the apex of the chin that will create a tilt of the wings upward. That will also make the vertical length of the chin longer by definition. It sounds like chin implant revision by repositioning of the chin implant back up on the bone will bring the wings back down as long as you are happy with the amount of horizontal chin projection that you now have. This would not require the use of a new chin implant unless there were other changes to your chin augmentation result that you desire.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, Do you know anything about Ultherapy? I had it ten months ago and had my ass handed to me. I developed not just volume loss (a ton) but it shrunk my eyes. I’m not sure if it was just the muscles or the vitreous humor as well. I’ve seen this with quite a few women. Not sure if you know medically/technically what is going on, but even if it is impossible to fix, I’d love to have a scientific explanation.
A: Like many facial skin tightening devices, they work by driving various forms of energy into the skin. This almost always results in the creation of heat whose effects will pass some distance below the skin. Thus the scientific explanation is simple….the energy driven below the tissues causes fat loss/atrophy. It is a simple function of heat and its effects on the fat cells. Fat cells are very sensitive to heat that exceeds 40 to 45 degrees Centigrade and such temperatures have well known fat atrophy/loss effects and is even the basis for devices who are for treating excess fat. Why Ultherapy would cause periorbital fat loss when that area was not directly treated I can not say.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in buttock augmentation. I(Brazilian Butt Lift) What is the cost, how long would I have to be off work. what does it mean by not all of the fat would survive?
A: The cost of Brazilian Butt Lift surgery is variable based on the ‘size’ of the assignment. The more fat that needs to be harvested is going to take more surgical time and costs. But on average the total cost of BBL surgery is in the range of $7500 to $8500. Recovery from BBL surgery is essentially like recovering from a major liposuction surgery. While I suspect you could get back to work in about 2 weeks after the procedure that does not mean you would be fully recovered. That probably takes about a full size weeks. The success of BBL surgery depends on how much fat actually survives the harvest and transfer process. What the amount of fat survival will vary amongst patients, it is far to say that not all of the fat will survive, usually only about 60% to 70% will be retained at the most optimistic estimate. This is why in most Brazilian Butt Lift surgeries it is important to harvest as much fat as possible and place as much as the buttock tissues can tolerate.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, For my otoplasty reversal another material you had mentioned in the office consultation that I am now interested in but I did not talk much about then is the use of irradiated rib cartilage. This material interests me in that it would be the closest in material to my own (rib) cartilage.From what I’ve read, when sourced well it can be as effective as autogenous rib cartilage, however on the longterm resorption is more common. What would your thoughts be on this irradiated homologous rib cartilage? Risks? Concerns? This seems like a material that would do well at holding the cartilage apart during the healing process and provide the needed projection for the middle support as it can be shaped to any size. It may be a more expensive material to source but that cost wouldn’t be a big concern for me as would finding the best material long term. I’m very interested to hear your thoughts and thank you for your time.
A: While resorption of irradiated cartilage is always a potential issue, this would be less relevant in an otoplasty reversal where the need for an outward pushing force probably does not need to be permanent. And although resorption can occur with irradiated cartilage it does not always occur and is usually partial and not complete. It does come in a nice wedge form of 1 cm width which is really perfect for otoplasty reversal. The only real drawback to using irradiated cartilage is its cost. At $1000 per piece the cost of irradiated cartilage in otoplasty reversal is over $2000 just for the material.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in forehead augmentation. I have very large brow ridges, and a sloping forehead with a prominent central bump in front of the coronal suture. I suffered a blow to the sagittal region as a younger boy and I have always believed that I suffer from premature suture closure. The sagittal skull region is pointed and my skull height is reduced. I read your procedure articles about plastic implants in the forehead region to round the forehead and perhaps make it appear higher and more vertical, as well as similar implants to widen and heighten the overall head shape. I am 69 years old and have combed my hair over my forehead since I was a young man because I am embarrassed about my appearance. At my current age, and with thinner, receding hairline, this is becoming impossible. Can you help me?
A: One is really never too old to address a physical problem that has bothered them all of their lifetime. From your pictures you have a very backward sloped forehead. This make your brow bones look bigger than they really are and also create the illusion that your forehead is too high. Forehead augmentation, using either a custom made implant or using bone cement, can provide a very effective solution to changing the slope of the forehead. In forehead augmentation the goal is to make the forehead inclination closer to 75 to 85 degrees if possible.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in brow bone reduction. I don’t need much so I think a burring technique could be fine.I read on your website that burring doesn’t actually weaken the bone. However I play football for my school and I just want to make sure that I wouldn’t break the bone if I got hit too hard. Is that a concern I should have?
A: What you undoubtably are referring on my website was that of the skull reduction in general. Removing some of the outer skull bone does not weaken it. But brow bone reduction of the frontal sinus is different because what lies under it is a large air space. Burring of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus probably does weaken it a bit from the perspective of being easier to fracture from direct trauma. But this is not a practical concern since that amount of trauma needed to break the bone would probably break it anyway if it occurred…whether it had been burred or not.
In a burring reduction technique in brow bone reduction, the anterior wall of the frontal sinus is thinned down as much as possible without actually entering the underlying air space.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in getting some initial information about a tummy tuck and breast lifts. I also sustained an injury to one buttock, leaving a large dent of scar tissue that I would like to have repaired if possible.
A: There are numerous types of tummy tuck surgery (eight to be exact) and breast lifts (four to be exact) so it is impossible for me to say which type of tummy tuck and breast lifts would be best for you. I am also unsure what your buttock deformity looks like although I could imagine. The good thing is that that tissue from the tummy tuck (dermal-fat graft) or fat injections from any liposuction can be used for reconstruction of the buttock indentation. I could provide you with more specifics about these procedures if I knew what you looked like. You could do that by sending in some pictures of your abdomen and breasts. Otherwise I would have to see you in the office to know exactly what you need.
A tummy tuck, breast lifts and buttock fat grafting could all be done in a single operation which would allow for just one recovery. The tummy tuck is usually what requires the most recovery. The recovery from other procedures falls well within that of the tummy tuck recovery period.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I have had two prior facial asymmetry correction procedures on my jaw. I had an implant placed on my right jaw only which is the side that is imbalanced. It is imbalanced both in width and in depth/length if that makes sense and the surgeon only corrected the width – which he did in excess. Hence I still have the depth discrepancy and it really is simply imbalanced now to the opposite direction it was initially.
The revision was to shave down the initial implant as it was far too large. The revision did not do much and was done poorly – the end of the implant now has a lump that is obvious. I’ve attached pictures for you to review. Please let me know if you need additional or different angles. One of the things that really bothers me is that the fullness is such that my left side often has shadowing that my right does not which almost emphasizes the asymmetry the doctor created.
A: What your case illustrates is how hard is to do facial asymmetry correction surgery by the doctor ‘winging it’. (that is not a criticism of him per se) It is very hard to just eyeball the facial asymmetry and place an implant and have it be right. That rarely is a successful strategy. It often leads to revisional surgery which still doesn’t solve the problem. Also you can see how just a few millimeters one way or the other can make a big difference on the outside of the face. When one has had a failed attempts at facial asymmetry correction along the jawline, it is best to get a better view of the problem. A 3D CT scan is the best way to really see the bony asymmetry, see where the implant is situated and what it looks like and then design a better implant that is matched to the bone on the other side and fits the jawline intimately.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I’ve had a brow bone reduction procedure before. It was a frontal sinus reduction. This procedure didn’t really solve my issue. I am unhappy with my forehead prominence and how especially at 45 degree angles it looks really abnormal. Is there a procedure to smooth this feature to get rid of the sticking out effect, but also not feminize my face. Obviously I am a male and not wanting a feminization look, i just want to smooth out my forehead protrusion.
A: In looking at your pictures it is unclear as to what type of brow bone reduction procedure you had. By your description of ‘frontal sinus reduction’ that would imply that you had a setback of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus. But with your current brow bone protrusion that is hard to believe. May be it was just burring a few millimeters of the anterior sinus wall. But the degree of brow bone protrusion aside, your forehead appears to be at a 45 degree angle. (although that is hard to tell based on your hairstyle) Such forehead inclinations can make the brow bones appear to stick out further than they really do. (pseudo brow prominence) This may have partially contributed to the ineffectiveness of your prior brow bone reduction surgery. It may be that forehead augmentation to change the slope of the forehead may be more beneficial. By so doing this will also maintain a masculine appearance. To make that determination I need to do some computer imaging from the side view and will need a picture that shows your forehead without hair hanging over it.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I was looking into this procedure to create a more masculine jawline and prominent chin as I feel currently my face has the more oval shape as opposed to a squarer shape that I would prefer due to high jaw insertions and a slightly recessive chin. As you can see in the photos there is some degree of jawline asymmetry present as the left side is significantly more developed than the right, would this asymmetry necessitate the use of a custom implant as opposed to the off the shelf chin and jaw implants. Thanks very much.
A: You would need a custom jawline implant (one piece wrap around type) for the following two reasons. First, the lower facial augmentation effect you are trying to create requires a smooth augmentation from one jaw angle to the angle across the chin. A separate three piece approach (chin and two jaw angle implants) would not have this smooth widening jawline effect. Secondly with the degree of jawline asymmetry that you have, only a custom jawline implant made from your 3D CT scan can be designed to take that into account to get the best jaw symmetry as possible.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in a facelift bit can’t decide if doing it under local or a general anesthetic is best. The use of local anesthesia is appealing as it lowers cost and avoids the risks of a general anesthetic. But I want to be comfortable and have a good experience. What do you recommend?
A: The debate of local vs. general anesthesia for facelift surgery is an historic one and continues to this very day. I have heard it many times and like many chronic debates the issues are not black and white and sometimes the main point of the discussion is overlooked. Let me provide some clarification for you.
The discussion of local vs general anesthesia for a facelift makes the assumption that the facelift part is the same and the only difference is in the level of anesthesia. This is a mistaken assumption and is actually the incorrect question on this issue. The real question is what type of facelift can be done under local vs general anesthesia? As I can assure you the type of facelift obtainable does differ with patient comfort. So the question is what type of facelift does the patient need and does it require general anesthesia to be done in the most through manner possible and with the greatest patient comfort. More complete facelifts that include a lot of neck work usually need to be done under general anesthesia. Smaller or more limited facelifts may be able to be done under local anesthesia with IV sedation. (aka conscious sedation)
One erroneous assumption about anesthesia that is not a general anesthetic is that it costs less. While on the surface that is true. (you do not pay for anesthesiologist’s time) But those cost savings are wiped out as it will take the surgeon more time to do the procedure. For example if it is takes the surgeon 50% more time to do the same procedure under local or IV sedation that could be in less time under a general anesthetic, the surgeon’s charge for doing the surgery can not be the same. One important but often overlooked element in calculating the cost of the surgery is the surgeon’s time. To some degree the surgeon’s charge for doing any surgery is highly influenced by the time it takes to do it. The point being is that it rarely makes good sense to choose a local/IV sedation option vs general anesthetic for many elective cosmetic procedures because you are trying to save money.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I had upper and lower jaw surgery in 2011 where I was referred by my orthodontist and convinced that I needed it. However, they ruined my face and my bite has subsequently shifted. I would like a sharp jawline. Is it possible to get jaw angle implants? Now, I cannot close my mouth properly and I have a weak chin.
A: While I do not know what you looked like previously, I can see now that you have a very steep mandibular plane (high jaw angles) and a recessed chin. From a jaw angle standpoint, vertical lengthening jaw angle implants are needed to drop the angle down and provide a more square angle shape. (not really square but closer to 110 degrees) Given that you have had prior jaw surgery (and I assume a sagittal split mandibular osteotomy, SSRO), your jaw angles are likely asymmetric and scarred. Custom jaw angle implants would be the ideal method for these unique jaw angle shapes.
For the chin the options would be either a sliding genioplasty or an implant as part of a total jawline implant which includes the jaw angles. Initially I would favor a sliding genioplasty because the vertical height of your chin needs to be reduced. But a custom implant may be designed this way also.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I want a Brazilian butt lift and tummy tuck. Can I get a combined surgery package and price for these two procedures.
A: The combination of a Brazilian Butt Lift and a tummy tuck can be done together. But that is a tough combination in terms of recovery and discomfort. I have done it and patients do get through it but it will be a lot tougher than you envision. Ideally it is better to harvest all the fat that one can from the abdomen and flanks for the Brazilian Butt Lift and deal with the loose skin in a second surgery. (tummy tuck) Whether the combination or staged approach would be better for you depends on what your abdomen looks like now.
While patients understandably would like to combine these procedures to lower costs and have just one big recovery, that approach can be short sighted. In women that have very large abdomens and a lot of excess abdominal skin, it may be more prudent to stage the two procedures. That way the best result may be obtained for both the Brazilian Butt Lift and the tummy tuck with a lower chance of complications.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, Is there amount of weight you have to lose to get a tummy tuck… what is the recovery time after tummy tuck surgery?
A: It is always best to lose whatever amount of weight one wants to, if possible, before having a tummy tuck. Once one is within 10 to 15 lbs of their weight goal, then one can have the tummy tuck. Doing a tummy tuck and then losing 20, 30 or 40 lbs after will adversely affect the tummy tuck results creating some additional loose skin. Or at the least making the once taut abdominal skin feel more loose.
Recovery after a tummy tuck depends on how you choose to define recovery. A complete recovery, feeling like you do now, will take 6 to 8 weeks. This is the time when you will feel like you can do anything that you do now and feel comfortable doing it. Some people do return to work, for example, two to three weeks after a tummy tuck. But they are usually struggling to do and only do it because they have to. So recovery could be defined as two or three weeks but I would call it a minimal recovery and an incomplete one at that.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in a combination of procedures including:
1. Brow bone implant augmentation using a custom made brow bone implant and possibly forehead augmentation as well. As you can see from the attached pictures this area of my face lacks definition. i would like a more masculine look. I had upper eyelid surgery done some six years ago. Unfortunately that was a botched operation, the surgeon operating on me sliced off too much of my left eyelid which has left the eye about half way to a third open when I close my eyes. The left eye is wider than the right when open. I was wondering, since the brow augmentation is performed around this area, would this type of surgery cause my eyes,particularly the left one to open further, thereby leaving the eye completely open when shut or when i am asleep? I guess implanting around this area is bound to pull the upper eyelid area upwards and pressure on the tissue surrounding that area.. I would not consider going ahead with brow bone implant augmentation if this is the case. Your opinion on this is greatly appreciated
2. Lip reduction to lower and upper lips. Just minor reduction to counter drooping which I notice and is probably due to me getting on in age. When at rest I can see the pink of my inner lips showing.
3. Alar base reduction in combination with Weir incisions to reduce nasal side walls and inner nostrils as well. When I smile my nostril flare excessively which bothers me, so I refrain from smiling as much as I can.
4. Finally I would like to raise/heighten my dorsal bridge as well as trim the bony area along the bridge to give definition. In addition I would like the bulbous nasal tip defatted if this is something you can do. Again, I just a subtle change as I do not want it looking to pointy.
5. I have had previous rhinoplasty with a premaxillary implant inserted below nasal base and I want to remove this.
Are these procedures you can do? Can you perform these procedures at the same time? Have you any experience performing all the procedures i have mentioned above on ethnic people like me?
A: Thank you for your inquiry and sending all of your pictures. In answer to your procedural questions:
- When it comes to a brow bone implant it is critically important that the decision for total forehead augmentation be considered using computer imaging. That has to be factored into the implant design. With the slope of your forehead I suspect brow bone augmentation only may only make the forehead look more inclined backward. As for the effect on the eyes, I have not really seen much effect on the eyelid position. If anyway I would think it would push the eyelids down lower and not pulled upward.
- Lip reduction almost produces less of a lip reduction effect than most patients want. So a more subtle lip reduction effect is the more likely one to be achieved as opposed to too much of a reduction.
- Reduction of nostril width changes the outer location of the nostril but has no effect on the inner nostril along the midline columella.
- The height of the nasal bridge can be raised and this can be done by either an implant or a rib graft. Since you may already being having a brow bone-forehead implant, I suspect the implant option would be more appealing. Reducing a bulbous tip in thick-skinned men always produces more of a subtle change and never a dramatic or a pointy one.
- The premaxillary implant can be easily removed.
All of these procedures can be done at the same time (custom forehead implant, rhinoplasty, lip reduction and premaxillary implant removal) The only thing ‘ethnic’ about your procedures is that of the nose and I have done many such ethnic rhinoplasties.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, On your website you seem to do plastic surgery related to skull reshaping. Has there ever been a case where someone had macrocephaly or a head circumference of 24.5 inches where you reduced this to 22 inches? I don’t think burring would accomplish that much. Would a craniectomy (or removing part of the skull) accomplish this or is that too dangerous. I have been able to reduce the size some myself by constricting and applying pressure to the scalp from different angles in a similar way a baby is fitted with a cranial mold.
A: The simple answer to your skull reshaping question is that burring is all you can do. You are not going to a craniectomy for an aesthetic skull size concern for a number of reasons including surgical risks, bony irregulatiies and, if nothing more, sheer cost. That is an operation that will cost $50,000+ to do with a neurosurgeon.
No one is able to have their skull reduced by 2 inches or more in circumference even with a craniectomy. (you have forgotten to take into account the space the brain needs which will tolerate no inward push)
Whatever reduction you have obtained by ‘compressive wrapping’ of the scalp, burring reduction will at least do that if not more. But burring reduction is the only aesthetic skull reshaping option you have.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in buttock and calf augmentation. I prefer the fat from my body to be used. But I have one question… how long will the fat persist in my calfs and buttocks?
A: Thank you for sending your pictures. Fat injection calf augmentation can be done as long as one has enough fat to harvest to do the procedure. It would be very unlikely, however, that one would have enough fat to do both their buttocks and calfs. You would likely have to choose to place fat either in the calfs or the buttocks and choose an implant for the other location. Given that fat takes and persists better in the buttocks, it would make the most sense to use all of the available fat for the buttocks. Fat injections do not persist very well in the calfs and calf implants offer a simple, assured and permanent augmentation procedure.
When it comes to body contouring by fat injections it is important to understand that they work best in areas that already have some fat. Thus it is no surprise that fat injections work better for buttock augmentation than they do for calf augmentation.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana