Are Fat Injections Better Than Cheek Implants?
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am interested in some type of cheek implant I think. I am not sure whether I have weak cheekbones or whether they are average or it is really a lack of fat or a lack of orbital rim development that gives me those lines under my eyes near the cheekbone. (Not tear trough) I have gotten comments on having a sunken/droopy “eyes” look when I’m cutting body fat and I’d prefer to have a much more healthy looking eye area when I’m at a lean fat %, just not too feminine either. I just wasn’t sure if that was primarily due to the cheekbone, orbital rims, or an odd lack of fat storage in that area of the face. So if am just to augment my orbital rims (lateral, inferior) and perhaps a bit of the anterior cheek (not too feminine) don’t you think fat transfer is my best option rather than a cheek implant, since a cheek implant doesn’t really touch those areas?
A: Cheek implants are your best treatment option but not the way you currently think of them. You do have a ‘weak’ orbitomalar area which is the result of infraorbital rim and cheekbone deficiency/underdevelopment and a thin soft tissue cover. Fat injection grafting will not work to create any sustained desired augmentation as it will be absorbed completely in less than 4 to 6 weeks after placement. The only effective approach is a combined infraorbital rim-cheek implant, probably only about 4mms thick, which will completely and permanently augment this area. While this is ideal, it will require a custom fabrication (thin tissues have no tolerance for anything less than a perfect fit that feathers on all edges) and that it will require an eyelid (subciliary) incisions to place them.
Dr. Barry Eppley