Posts Tagged ‘dr barry eppley’
Tuesday, May 21st, 2013
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am curious about having liposuction on my abdomen and thighs what is the average cost, I want to remove about 15lbs.
A: Thank you for your inquiry. While it would be helpful to see some pictures of your abdomen and thighs, let me ask you a few questions in regards both areas:
1) Is this your full abdomen?
2) Do you need the flanks or muffin tops t.reated as well as your abdomen?
3) Do the thighs include both sides, inner and outer? Knees?
When considering cost, knowing exactly what areas needs to be treated as this allows the time to do the procedure to be properly determined. Fundamentally, liposuction like all cosmetic surgery and its cost revolves around the timer to do it.
While 15 lbs of aspirate (1 liter of liposuction aspirate roughly equals 8 lbs) may be removed in surgery, this does not necessarily mean that will translate into 15 lbs of actual body weight lost.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis,Indiana
Tags: dr barry eppley, indianapolis, liposuction Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Monday, May 20th, 2013
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am seriously contemplating having chin revision surgery done by you due to a persistent unilateral numbness on the right side of my chin and lower lip area. This has been causing me a lot of distress for almost 2 years. On top of this, my right mentalis muscle doesn’t contract properly which causes a very noticable crooked smile and asymmetries in other facial expressions.
Here is a short history of what was done on my chin. About 3 years ago a plastic surgeon placed a Medpor chin implant with a 5mm projection via intraoral incision. It was the implant shown in this photo, but with a fair amount of custom reshaping. There were several issues after the first surgery though. While the left side seemed to be alright, the right side wasn’t. The implant was shaped assymmetrically (less prominent on the right angle. The right wing protruded about 2mm from the chin bone, i.e. it didn’t touch the bone which resulted in a bad transition as well as serious irritation and pain that wouldn’t resolve. The implant appeared to protrude slightly more on the right frontal part than on the left. Therefore my surgeon injected hyaluronic acid on the left frontal part to temporarily ameliorate this assymmetry until revision surgery. There was also numbness and lack of motor control of the chin and lower lip. The numbness and lack of motor control eventually fully resolved, but it took a whole year! However, the other problems made a revision surgery necessary. In this surgery the following was done. An intraoral incision merely on the right side (only the right muscle was cut through!), taking away the back part of the right wing to ease the irritation and pain, placing additional MedPor material on the right angle of the chin implant to make it more prominent and placing additional MedPor material on the left frontal part of the chin implant. The revision surgery took care of the irritation and ameliorated the assymmetries, meaning the chin now looked more symmetrically although still not perfect.
Unfortunately, the revision surgery brought more bad than good things. Now the major issue is that even after almost 2 years since revision surgery I still have unilateral numbness in my right chin and lower lip area and serious lack of motor control of my right mentalis muscle. This all became gradually better, but the progress has long halted and I am pretty certain that the remaining numbness and lack of motor control won’t improve any further with time. My surgeon said the odd behaviour of my right mentalis is caused by scar tissue located on the left frontal part pulling on the right side. I have no idea if this is possible. I rather think that the problem is not the scar tissue, but the mentalis muscle itself. Maybe it was not properly resuspended. This is were I need your opinion the most. I attached some images and a video so you can get a better idea of my problems. Among the images is an xray scan that faintly shows the chin implant. Maybe this helps you determine if the implant impinges on some nerve. Also, would you say that my chin is sagging somewhat? Can this be fixed? As a side note I should mention that I have a tendency for scarring and fairly bad wound healing.
Based on my description I have several question that you can hopefully answer:
- What would be your general advise in a situation like this?
- How would you approach another revision surgery? Does the mentalis muscle have to be resuspended? Is there hope it will return to normal functioning?
- Was it a sound approach to only make an incision through the right mentalis muscle? Wasn’t this screaming for a muscle dysbalance later on?
- Would it make sense to make an incision under the chin and not inside the mouth should a revision surgery be necessary again? It seems like cutting through my muscles is causing a lot of complications. But I guess the intraoral approach is necessary if the mentalis muscle has to be resuspended, right?
- Do you think the implant is aesthetically OK?
- Is it a good idea to take out the old implant and place a new and maybe smaller one? I suspect the current one might be slightly too large.
I’d like to thank you very much in advance for taking the time to read and respond to my email. Hopefully you have some encouraging news for me.
A: Thank you for your inquiry. I have reviewed your history, pictures and video and can make the following comments:
1) Your case illustrates why placing a firm and inflexible Medpor chin implant through the mouth is generally a bad idea, it is associated with a significant risk of all the complications that you have experienced. But that is water over the dam now.
2) I find the aesthetics of your chin result very acceptable and certainly don’t think it is too big.
3) I would NEVER think at this point of trying to remove and replace your chin implant. That is a disaster waiting to happen. Given what has transpired up to the present and the difficult with removing Medpor implants, the risk of worse nerve and muscle problems is very likely. It may not be perfect but a perfect chin result for you is no longer a reasonable goal. I would advise that you accept a reasonable aesthetic outcome. Revisional surgery for you, as you have learned, has a lot more risk of problems than it does in making things better.
4) It would be highly unlikely at this point that, even if the implant was impinging on the nerve (which I doubt) that relieving it is going to cause return of feeling. The nerve fibers have atrophied and the damage is irreversible at this point.
5) I do not think you have chin ptosis or sagging.
6) As for mentalis muscle dysfunction, I would have a very low level of confidence that any efforts at trying to resuspend the muscle would end up in the long run giving you a better result than you have now.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis,Indiana
Tags: chin implant revision, dr barry eppley, indianapolis Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Monday, May 20th, 2013
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am planning on having a scar revision for a vertical scar on the bridge of my nose. At the same time I want to correct sinus problems: turbinoplasty, septoplasty as well as rhinoplasty for some minor aesthetic improvements. I’m hoping the minor nose humps can be grinded so they won’t exaggerate the contours of the scar. How can I minimize the new scar on the bridge from becoming widened over time, developing little arterioles, or the skin getting too thin? What laser should I plan for post-surgery?
A: Based on your question, I would need to have a better idea as to the type of external rhinoplasty you would be having. Will this involve rasping of the bridge or will it require osteotomies as well? Either way, however, I would not perform a scar revision directly over the nasal skin that is being raised during the rhinoplasty. This is not a blood supply concern but one of scar healing. The swelling of the nasal tissues after a rhinoplasty will work directly against having a good scar result. You would be much better to delay the scar revision to after the rhinoplasty, preferably 3 to 6 months later. Scar revision on raised rhinoplasty skin is not a good simultaneous idea if you want the best scar result.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: dr barry eppley, indianapolis, nose scar revision, rhinoplasty Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Monday, May 20th, 2013
Q: Dr. Eppley, I have a depressed cheek scar above my nasolabial fold from a previous skin cancer removal using a Moh’s technique. If you inject fat do you utilize the Coleman technique with micro droplets to ensure the tissue becomes a graft and not just a temporary filler? Anyhow, I do not like the dynamic feature when I move the facial muscle as well as when the sight catches the groove of the scar. I have attached some pictures showing the scar. Thank you for your time.
A: Thank you for sending your pictures. I did not realize how young you were given that you have had Moh’s. It is actually a reasonable result in a difficult aesthetic area. The only modification I would make to my previous statement is that I would perform a geometric scar revision at the same time as microdroplet fat injections underneath. Even though the scar is well placed and has about as much narrowness as could be hoped for, there is always going to be a ‘groove effect’. That is just an unavoidable phenomenon in linear scar in that area. The scar line may need to changed from a pure straight line to get a better scar effect. Options include either fat injections with concurrent laser resurfacing (#1) or fat injections with a concurrent geometric broken line scar revision. (GBLSR) The conservative approach would be # 1 as GBLSR can always be done later based on the scar outcome. The more aggressive approach would be #2.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: dr barry eppley, facial scar revision, fat injections, indianapolis Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Monday, May 20th, 2013
Q: Dr. Eppley, I went to see a maxillofacial surgeon to get jaw reduction (my jaw is too square and X rays show that my angles do stick out). He told me that he needed to do a small resection of the angles (osteotomy) because my angles were too square to burr them. and with the burring technique, only 2 or 3mm could be burred which would barely show. Is it possible to round off the angles with the osteotomy technique? or will it be a straight cut leaving the angles straight looking cut and unnatural? is it possible to preserve some angles with that technique? Also, what really surprised me is that he said that since the bone is so far and hard to get to due to the muscles, he might need to put some screws; I did not understand why. I thought that screws were used to put bones back into a new position; which would not be the case with angles osteotomy? I am confused. Thank you for your answers.
A: I can only speak for what I do, I can not explain what your surgeon said or their technique. When you cut off the angles, no matter how small, there will be a rounding effect created. Burring in the jaw angle area can be difficult because of the surgical access. Therefore, I choose to use a reciprocating saw and perform an outer table ostectomy, which thins the bone but preserves most of the angle’s shape. I have never used screws for this technique nor can I envision why they would be needed.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: dr barry eppley, indianapolis, jaw angle reduction Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Sunday, May 19th, 2013
Q: Dr. Eppley, I had a Moh’s surgery on my right cheek Dec. 27th 2012. I am unhappy about the indentation on the mid to lower half of the scar especially when I speak. I have photos I can send. Would like to know if you think I would need a revision, subcision, or laser, or this will subside in the months. Also, if revised, do you agree with the theory of lasering 4 to 8wks after sutures are removed to reconfigure the modeling of the tissues resulting in superior results, rather than waiting the full year of the old theory. I am not interested in temporary fillers.
A: I am assuming that you had a primary closure of your original Moh’s defect. The reason you have an indentation is that there is tissue missing over a dynamic area. As such, no amount of release or scar revision is going to improve its appearance. This is a tissue loss problem and releasing underneath or cutting out the scar/indentation from above does not address the biology of why it is there. I would take a reverse approach to conventional wisdom by doing fat injections under the indented area. This will provide both a release and adds volume at the same time. While fat may be unpredictable in survival, this natural form of tissue volume expansion better addresses the cause of the problem. This would be more effective done early in the healing process (months) rather than later. (year or longer) The overlying scar in the face of underlying tissue expansion should wait for further healing.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis,Indiana
Tags: cheek scar revision, dr barry eppley, fat injections, indianapolis Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Sunday, May 19th, 2013
Q: Dr. Eppley, three weeks ago I underwent surgery for brachioplasty on my arms. As the tape was coming off the incision looked great. There was no redness, it was perfect. As more of the tape started falling of I noticed that on the surface of a section of my incision, an opening, or blister, was forming. I was told to gently remove the rest of the tape down my arms. Now instead of seeing my original clean incision, I have a few blisters with a bit of pus along the incision line, and it is now read and bleeding slightly in some areas. Is this normal? I stopped wearing my compression shirt as were my doctors orders, but he said if it were to start swelling again to put it back on so I did. Does all of this sound normal?
A: There is a natural evolution of incisional healing that understandably confuses most patients as it relates to body contouring surgery. All incisions look fantastic the first 10 days or so after surgery because the wounds have not started to really heal yet and the normal inflammatory process has not set in. Then the incision line begins to look worse…gets red and inflamed in some areas and make even have a few sutures that work their way through the skin. This process will continue for up to about 8 weeks after surgery when the incision line is finally healed and the inflammatory process has subsided. What you are observing is perfectly normal and armlifts are one body area where this process can often be more exaggerated due to the thinness of the arm skin.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis,Indiana
Tags: armlift healing, dr barry eppley, indianapolis Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Sunday, May 19th, 2013
Q: Dr. Eppley, I have some questions about jaw angle implant surgery.
1) If I have a jaw implant surgery, do you custom make the jaw implant for my specific jaw? Is custom making an abnormal activity for jaw augmentation practitioners or something that is done with regularity at most clinics?
2. Which material do you normally use as implant and from which brand? Why do you do this type or these types of implants?
3. What are the best/worst properties with these type of implants?
4. Approx. how many jaw implants have you done in 2012 and 2013 and what are the total number of jaw implants you have done?
5. If you were to say a number of the total people that have underwent jaw implant surgery, how many have come back of the total number and been displeased with the result?
6. What were they not happy about? and what do you do in such an situation?
A: In answer to your questions:
1) I would need to see photos of your face to make an assessment of whether you need standard or custom jaw angle implants. It has been awhile since I have seen your pictures. Regardless, using custom jaw angle implants is done by a very few surgeons in the world.
2) Depending upon what dimensional changes need to be done, the implants could be made from either silicone (widening the jaw angle only) or Medpor if vertical lengthening of the jaw angle is needed.
3) I do dozens of cases of standard and custom jaw angle implants every year.
4) To you on the outside, the different materials of the implants are irrelevant. Your current choices of jaw angle implants is based on what dimensional changes you need so you really don’t have much choice when it comes to vertical lengthening jaw angle implants because only one manufacturer (Medpor) makes them.
5) The revision rate of jaw angle implants is not insignificant and averages around 20%. This is the hardest facial implant to surgically place.
6) Asymmetry is the biggest reason for revision of jaw angle implants. In some cases, the result may be too much or too little for their aesthetic liking.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: dr barry eppley, indianapolis, jaw angle implant revision Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Tuesday, May 14th, 2013
Q: Dr. Eppley, I have further questions in regards to Temporalis reduction please. The area I want reduced is around squama temporal and the parietal area near the temporal line. In anatomical images, the temporalis muscle shows up white in that region, so is there very little muscle mass there? Will Temporalis muscle show up on CT scans? Also, would the surgery involve having to sever my temporal arteries? If so, will there be side-effects later in life? As temporal concavity is dependent on muscle mass, is that why elderly people appear to have narrower temples due to muscle degeneration? If so, will temporalis reduction increase wrinkles around that area and make me look older? I know you said it won’t affect mastication processes, but would it impede speech and pronunciation, since it involves jaw movement too? Will temporal muscle reduction make me unable to play soccer or tennis for the rest of my life?
A: To answer your further questions on temporalis muscle reduction:
1) The muscle is thinner near the anterior temporal line.
2) The muscle will show up on a CT scan.
3) The superficial temporal artery is not cut during muscle reduction.
4) The fullness of the temporal region is prinicpally controlled by muscle mass and an underlying extension of the buccal fat pad. As people age the fat resorbs and the area becomes more concave. The temporalis muscle does not really atrophy with age.
5) Temporal muscle reduction will not affect chewing or speech.
6) I see no physical restriction after such surgeries for either tennis or soccer.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: dr barry eppley, indianapolis, temporal reduction Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Tuesday, May 14th, 2013
Q: Dr. Eppley, I have had multiple jaw implants that have left me with an unsatisfactory result. My jaw is naturally asymmetrical so it was hard for the surgeon to match left side to right side I suppose. He tried to fix the asymmetry by shaving down the implants, then another surgery to add implant on the right side which just made it bumpy and stuff. I think I just need to start over with newly designed implants. In addition I also want a reverse sliding genioplasty, my chin sticks out too far and looks unnatural. I can get a 3D print of my skull and a physical 3D exact model from a computer, so that new implants can be made to make my face sides perfectly symmetrical. I have attached a video which described in detail exactly what I don’t like about my jaw result.
A: I have seen your video and your problem is one I have seen many times. I can make the following comments:
1) Jaw angle implant asymmetry is not uncommon and is a result, most of the time, from different placements on the jaw angle rather than some inherent bony asymmetry. Bony asymmetry does not help but it is actually very difficult to get perfect symmetry (alignment of flare) between two jaw angle implants.
2) The problem you have on our left side is that the two implants (chin and jaw angle) do not meet, thus leaving a depression or lack of smoothness between the two. That, again, is reflective of the asymmetrical placement of the jaw angle implant on the left which is further back and higher than the right one. Note that your right side is smooth probably due to the better position of the right jaw angle implant.
3) Correcting jaw angle asymmetry, in my experience, rarely works by just shaving down the implants while they are in place. The implant almost always has to be removed, modified if necessary and then reinserted in a better position. Modifying it while in the patient is treating implant malposition by adjusting the shape or thickness of the implant, potentially worsening the problem or at the least ending up no better for the efforts.
4) You are correct in now assuming that the best approach to the problem is to get a 3D model of your jaw, see exactly where the implants are and make new implants if needed.
5) As for your chin, I do not have the advantage of knowing what you looked like before. But your chin result is not particularly abnormal or unexpected. It may be more projection than you want but many chin implants when placed on a smaller chin will end up with that result. It may look like it is sticking out and the labiomental sulcus will deepen. Medpor chin implants are thicker and more bulky than other materials and this may also be part of the aesthetic problem. You may simply benefit from a smaller projecting chin implant design.
In conclusion, making a completely symmetric 3-piece chin and angle jawline enhancement is not as easy as it looks on a skeletal model and you, unfortunately, are reflective of some of the problems which can occur. But your next step of getting a 3D analysis of what you have and why it looks that way is the only effective way to move forward.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis,Indiana
Tags: chin implant revision, custom chin and jaw angle implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, jaw angle implant revision Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
|
|
|
|