Posts Tagged ‘buttock implants’
Friday, January 27th, 2012
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am 36 yrs old and have been wearing padded underwear since I can remember. I am ready to have a bottom of my own that I can feel good about.This is my only insecurity and I am ready to do something about it. I want to be able to for the first time fill my jeans out and not have a belly that hangs over them.
A: There are two types of patients that seek buttock augmentation. The first and by far the most common is the patient who simply wants to make larger what they already have. They do not really have buttock hypoplasia or underdevelopment but want to enhance what they already have. This is very common in certain ethnic groups, particularly African-Americans and Hispanic women. The second group and the least common is the patient who really has not buttocks at all. They are completely flat and may even have resorted to padding as you have described.
This second group is the most challenging to treat because they have little to no subcutaneous fat in the buttocks and small gluteal muscles. This makes the recipient site for the most common method of treatment, fat injections (aka Brazilian Butt Lift), very limited. Often they may be quite thin as well without adequate fat donor sites. This leaves them the only option of an actual silicone buttock implant. Such implants can be very effective but they are associated with a longer recovery and other implant-related risks.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: brazilian butt lift, buttock augmentation, buttock implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Friday, December 2nd, 2011
Q: Dr. Eppley, I’m interested in buttock implants but I want to know what implant (oval or round) will give me the most volume. Also does round implants pull up enough muscle to give you a round booty or do you have to get fat grafting added? My butt isn’t flat at all but needs volume. Will the round implant give me upper buttock volume or all over volume (upper, middle, lower buttock). I was told only the oval can give you upper, mid, lower buttock fullness but not as much volume as a round. Thank you.
A: The answer to your question starts with what you have now and where you ideally want it to be. Buttock implants differ in the amounts of volume projection and generally a rounder buttock implant will have more projection. When patients use the word ’round booty’ that almost always means to me that they want a lot of volume projection. That may not be possible for some patients no matter what technique is used and, for others, may require that they ultimately need a implant and then fat grafting. (although this combinatio is very rare)
The effects of buttock implants is also influenced by whether they are placed subfascial or submuscular. Only subfascial placement can give the entire buttock fullness. Submuscular buttock implants mainly add mid- and upper volume enhancement. The location of the implant is often just as important as the style of implant used.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: buttock implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Sunday, May 29th, 2011
Q: Have you ever done rigid hip implants to make the iliac crest appear wider/bigger?
A: Let me offer you my opinion and experience on this currently rare plastic surgery procedure. The placement of an implant over the iliac crests, known as hip implants, is both possible and I have done one case previously. It is done through a small incision placed over the anterior superior iliac spine. The implant is placed in a soft tissue pocket directly on top of the ridge of the iliac crest. It does not go back as far as the posterior iliac spine. While the placement of the implant is not difficult, there are several potential problems with the procedure. First, there is no preformed or off-the-shelf hip implant that is available. To make a hip implant, a buttock implant is used and carved to shape during surgery. The implant material should not be rigid like the iliac crest but needs to be soft. Therefore, flexible silicone elastomer implant material is used. Secondly, it is not possible to rigidly secure the implant to the iliac crest without making numerous incisions along its course which would be aesthetically undesireable. Lastly, the concept of having a soft moveable implant over a rigid underlying rim of bone may pose issues of feeling the implant or discomfort when wearing clothes that ride up against them. This last issue is more theoretical than proven given that so few hip implants have ever been performed.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: buttock implants, dr barry eppley, hip implants, indianapolis Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Sunday, April 10th, 2011
Q: I am very interested in buttock implants. I was initially treated with fat grafting and spent a lot of money but the results did not last. This is why I don’t trust fat grafting and won’t do it again. I was greatly disappointed when I looked the same 3 months after the procedure. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
A: The choice between using your own tissues (fat grafting) versus an implant for augmentation of any body area can be a difficult one. The advantages and disadvantages of either approach are classic and predictable. A synthetic implant will produce a stable amount of augmentation but at the price of more invasive surgery and the risks of infection, seroma, implant migration and extrusion. Conversely, fat injection grafting has none of these risks but its volume retention and predictability of a long-term augmentation result is variable. In some cases, the results of fat grafting can be completely resorbed within a few months. For others, a second fat injection surgery is needed to get the desired augmentation volume.
Whether fat injections or an implant is best for anyone’s buttock augmentation starts first with the size and shape of one’s buttocks and what one’s end goal is. For some, the size of the buttocks one wants is very big and they have little to start with so an implant would be best. For others, their buttock size goal is more modest and they have something to work with from the beginning. For them, fat injections would be a good choice. If one has no significant fat to harvest on the abdomen, flanks or thighs, then implants will need to be used.
If you have had one unsuccessful fat injection surgery, then buttock implants become more appealing. You might feel differently if some of the fat from the first surgery survived.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: buttock augmentation with fat injections, buttock implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, plastic surgery of the buttocks Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Saturday, October 2nd, 2010
Q: I was interested in the buttock augmentation with fat injections. I was wondering what parts of the body the fat is taken from, whether I would be a good candidate for the procedure, and the time it will take to heal.
A: The use of injectable fat grafting for buttock augmentation, also known as the Brazilian Butt Lift, has become popular as an alternative to the use of buttock implants. The success of the procedure is based on three factors; having enough fat on the body from which to harvest from, having enough buttock subcutaneous tissue to inject into and how well does the inject fat survive.
Patient selection is the key element in the first two factors and can be determined before surgery is ever performed. The best donor site to get then most fat is usually the abdomen, flanks, and thighs. In general, a harvest volume of at least 1,500 ccs is needed to end up with a processed and concentrated volume of around 800ccs. This allows 350cc to 400cc to be injected into each buttock. Less volumes than this will usually not make the procedure worthwhile. The patient also gets the benefit of contouring from the harvest site as well. Whether one has enough fat to harvest is very easy to determine. Whether one has enough buttock subcutaneous tissue into which to inject is a bit more subjective. Buttock far augmentations work better in those that already have ‘some butt’ present. Completely flat and non-existant buttocks will have a much better result with an implant.
Recovery from buttock augmentation with fat injection is related to the donor site and not the buttocks. Overall recovery is just a few short weeks whicih is far less than when buttock implants are used.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis Indiana
Tags: buttock augmentation with fat injections, buttock implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, plastic surgery Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010
Q: I would like to know few things about butt implants Dr. Eppley did my breast implants few years ago and now i would love for him to do my butt. I want to go big. What sizes and shapes can I pick from?
A: Buttock augmentation is similar to breast augmentation in some ways but different in others. Buttocks implants, unlike breast implants, are made from a very soft and flexible solid silicone rubber material. They are not fluid-filled. Like breast implants, they can be placed above (subfascial) or under (actually into) the gluteal muscle. Those two different locations carry greater significance in buttock implants than in breast implants,, particularly in terms of recovery. Intramuscular implant placement is preferred but that also limits the size of the implant that can be used and makes the recovery much more prolonged and uncomfortable. One’s anatomy also can also drive this choice because if there is little subcutaneous fat present over the buttocks, the intramuscular location will produce a smaller but more aesthetic looking result. (concealing the implant edges better)
Buttock implants come in either round or oval shapes and have volumes ranging from about 150cc to 400ccs. Unlike breast implants, in which the size range that can be used is much more variable, the size and shape of buttock implants must be more closely matched to the surface anatomy and measurements of one’s buttocks. In the buttocks you don’t have the luxury of just putting in whatever size implant you want. The risks of postoperative problems and complications is higher when you do so.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: buttock augmentation, buttock implants, dr barrry eppley, indianapolis, plastic surgery Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Sunday, August 8th, 2010
Q: I’m 29, very healthy and I weigh 128 lbs. I have always wanted a more rounder shapely butt for years but never could get enough money for the procedure and was afraid of the risks associated with the procedure. My self-esteem is very low because of my small buttocks. I just want to feel good and feel secure about myself and my looks.
A: While buttock augmentation can be done with either an implant or fat injections, your small frame and low weight leave you with only the implant option. The good thing about buttock implants is that they produce a very nice result in a single operation and the augmentation is stable over one’s lifetime. Because it is an implant, however, there is a longer recovery and there are potential implant risks of infection or seroma formation.
The key, in my opinion, to your buttock augmentation is to place the implant into the gluteal muscle and not to place too big of an implant. Going above the muscle in the subfascial plane is not advised with low buttock soft tissue coverage. Getting good closure of the muscle over the implant during the surgery is important as it helps reduce the risk of any problems.
Recovery is the biggest short-term concern for buttock implants and one should really allow about three weeks before returning to work and most more normal activities. More physical activities like working out, running, and cycling will take up to 6 weeks until one is more confortable to do them.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: buttock augmentation, buttock implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, plastic surgery Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Thursday, June 3rd, 2010
Q: I don’t have a butt and my tail bone sticks out further then my butt. I have an pronounced tail bone and don’t have a butt. It hurts to sit long periods of time because of my tail bone and having no butt. My butt is really small and has no outside fat or butt to it. I can never find pants to fit because of having no butt to hold them up. I don’t wear bathing suits because of what little butt I have. I am 26 years old and would like to have a butt and not be embarrassed to wear tight jeans and/or a nice bathing suit in the summer time. I would like to see if you can help me with this. I had Ricket’s as a child and that is why I didn’t grow a butt. That is what the doctor’s told me and I would like to finally have a nice butt. Please help me if you can.
A: Buttock augmentation can be done by either injecting your own fat or using synthetic implants. While I usually prefer fat injections for buttock enlargement in my Indianapolis plastic surgery practice, there are certain limitations to its use. You have to have enough fat to harvest for transfer and there has to be some subcutaneous fat in your buttocks to put fat into. Fat grafts need an adequate fat bed to be implanted and grow. With absolutely no buttock substance at all (completely flat), fat injections are not a viable option. With such lack of buttock volume, the body habitus of such patients is that they would not have adequate fat to harvest anyway.
Buttock implants are the only option with such severe buttock hypoplasia. While the recovery and risks of buttock implants are important to consider, their submuscular placement is necessary if any significant buttock enlargement is to be obtained in a very thin patient.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: buttock implants, buttocl augmentation, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, plastic surgery, small butt Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Tuesday, April 27th, 2010
Q: I have been infected with HIV for 31 years, and have seen every one of my former friends and acquaintances succumb to AIDS. For some reason meds have always become available just in time to save my life. For that I am thankful But my life feels hardly worth living with the disfigurement of facial lipoatrophy and pain of buttock lipoatrophy. My face is so gaunt it is horrible and I have not butt at all!
A: One of the very unique effects of anti-viral medications in the management of HIV/AIDS is their effects on fat wasting or lipoatrophy. While much of the body (but not all) is affected by this fat loss, the face and the buttocks are frequent areas of aesthetic concern.
Facial lipoatrophy can be treated by two potential methods. The non-surgical approach is with the use of Sculptra injections. This is an FDA-approved injectable material that is essentially the placement of crystals or ‘seeds’ of a resorbable polymer that promotes collagen formation. It requires a series of injections over time to get a sustained response. The injections are placed in the cheek and submalar areas where the hollowing is the worst. While there is the possibility of a foreign-body reaction or granulomas with its use, good technique can minimize that risk. This injection material is not permanent and must be repeated every year or so once the desired result is obtained. From a surgical standpoint, cheek or submalar implants can be used which is actually my preferred approach. The procedure is simple, is done from incisions inside the mouth, and the volume obtained is permanent. Once can then use Sculptra to further highlight and feather the result out further into the face if desired.
Unlike the face, there is no good solution for the buttocks. Fat injections are not a good idea as there is no fat to harvest in most HIV patients and it will likely be absorbed anyway even if there was. Buttock implants are a possibility but the pain of recovery and the risk of infection may this procedure unappealing.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: buttock implants, buttock lipoatrophy in HIV, cheek implants in HIV, dr barry eppley, facial lipoartrophy, HIV lipoatrophy, indianapolis, plastic surgery, sculptra Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Friday, March 12th, 2010
Just when you think you have heard it all, a new and bizarre tale of cosmetic surgery rears its head. If I didn’t know any better, this story may well have happened in China or the back streets of a remote Siberian city.
From the Garden state of New Jersey in Essex County, a group of female patients (six to be exact) ended up in hospitals after undergoing buttock enhancement. Apparently, they received buttocks enhancement injections containing caulking material. The same material that is used to caulk windows and bathtubs was injected to make their glutes larger. Different from medical-grade silicone, the substance used in these Mengele-like botched procedures was believed to be a diluted version of a nonmedical-grade silicone. Traditional buttock enlargement procedures are done with either a medical-grade solid silicone implant or with fat injections.
Apparently administered by unlicensed providers, the women were admitted to hospitals following the injections after developing raging infections. They were treated with surgery and antibiotics and appear to be recovering (although, you can be certain their buttocks will never be the same).
While many may wonder why anyone would want their buttocks enlarged (since many women would actually want them reduced), this is a popular request amongst certain ethic groups where a fuller and rounder buttocks is more appealing. Some have called this the Jennifer Lopez effect.
While these cases are certainly a tragedy, the looming question is how could this happen? In a country with the finest and most advanced medical technology in the world, how does someone come to the fate of having their butt caulked?
While injectable aesthetic treatments, such as Botox, collagen and fat, have been a real advance in plastic surgery, there is a rare, dark side to the concept. Because injection therapy is not surgery, it is not regulated like traditional plastic surgery procedures. There is no oversight and many of these treatments take place in a wide variety of settings by ‘providers’ of all backgrounds.
Because of their apparent simplicity to administer, injectable treatments are often viewed as a commodity. As in, ‘what treatment can I get for the lowest price’? While searching for bargains is commendable in many retail situations, a faux watch or look-alike handbag does not carry the same risk as do faux injection materials.
While not common in this part of the U.S., black-market injectors do exist and their practitioners prey on the weakest and least educated consumer- those that often can least afford it. As crazy as the butt caulking incident sounds, there has been a recent history of dubious practitioners providing cosmetic implants of nonmedical-grade materials. They function in a makeshift office for a short time, then get put out of business…only long enough for other shady providers to take their place.
Most of these incidents happen in large metropolitan cities with a high percentage of immigrant populations. In such an environment it is easy to hide, to be invisible to the authorities, and find plenty of victims before moving on. Smaller cities like Indianapolis are more difficult for unlicensed providers to remain anonymous as they are more quickly exposed, and appeal to a much smaller population.
The conclusion is …Caveat emptor: Buyer beware. If the costs of the procedure look too good to be true, there is probably a reason.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: buttock enlargement, buttock implants, dr barry eppley, fat injections to the buttocks, indianapolis, plastic surgery Posted in Newspaper Articles | No Comments »
|
|
|
|