Posts Tagged ‘breast implants’
Monday, January 2nd, 2012
Q: Dear Dr. Eppley, my breasts are slightly droopy and I want them to be more perky. I thought I needed a lift but one doctor that I consulted with said that I needed more volume in my breast instead of a lift. He said this could be done with an implant or fat injections. The length between my nipple to sternal notch is 22.5 cm. Should I have breast lift or breast augmentation? If augmentation is best, which treatment is better an implant or fat injections?
A: The key to knowing whether a lift or the addition of volume can make the breast look better depends on the position of the nipples. If it sits above the lower breast fold, then volume is the answer. While I do not know exactly what your breasts look like, knowing that the distance from your nipples to the sternal notch is only 22 cms tells me that your nipples are definitely above the inframamammary folds. That is essentially a completely normal or ideal nipple position. (the normal range is 18 to 22 cms depending in the length of one’s torso)
Since more breast volume is the answer, the question of whether it can be done with an implant or fat injections becomes very relevant. The use of fat injections for augmentation of a variety of body areas has become very popular in plastic surgery recently. While it is widely accepted for volume augmentation of the face and buttocks, its use in the breast is currently controversial. This is because there already exists an augmentation method that works well and is very reliable, an implant. For overall breast augmentation, an implant works better, is a one-step procedure, and will cost less. If there is just one area of the breast that needs filled in, then fat injections becomes the preferred treatment.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: breast implants, breast lift, dr barry eppley, fat injections to the breast, indianapolis Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Monday, December 12th, 2011
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am going to get breast implants and need some help in selecting size. I am currently a 34B with one breast about a quarter of cup larger than the other. They are perky but just not full. I am uncertain on whether to get saline or silicone implants and am looking for the most natural result possible.
A: When it comes to getting a natural breast augmentation result, it does not matter whether a saline or silicone implant is used. That has nothing to do with making a difference between looking augmented or not. Rather it is a function of implant size and implant location (above or below the muscle) as well as what your breast tissues look like now. As a general rule, it is almost always better to go below the muscle so that there is a natural slope in the upper pole of the breast. If you keep the implant base width at the same size or less than that of your natural breast base width, you will almost always look fairly natural. The size of breast implants is directly related to their base diameter. The larger the base diameter, the larger the implant. A simple tape measurement of your breast base diameter would help considerably in making a good implant size selection for you.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: breast implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, natural breast augmentation Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Thursday, November 24th, 2011
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am going to get breast implants and have had several consultations. One confusing point for me is whether the implants should be above or below the muscle. Of the two consults I have had one says above the muscle and the other is adamant that they go below the muscle. What do you think?
A: There are is no absolutely best position for breast implants in any particular patient. There are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches. The vast majority of patients today have implants placed beneath the muscle for better pocket stability, a more natural look (upper pole shape), better tissue coverage, a lower rate of rippling and less interference with mammograms. The one downside to under the muscle is that there will be animation deformities, meaning the implants will be pushed to the side unnaturally with pectoralis mucle contraction when the arms are extended. The one benefit to an implant being above the muscle is when there is some breast tissue sagging, it can fill out the sagging tissues better. The other under the muscle benefit is for someone who was looking for less recovery time and pain and could not avoid adjusting their fitness regimen or someone who has to have the procedure done under local anesthesia for medical and fear of anesthesia reasons.
In the end, one has to weigh these advantages and disadvantages from the perspective of their own breast anatomy and shape. As a general rule, always remember that any implant in the body always does better in the long run (i.e., less complications) when placed under a thicker soft tissue cover particularly when under well-vascularized muscle.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: breast augmentation, breast implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Wednesday, October 26th, 2011
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am 44 years old and have had silicone implants for just over 10 years. I have noticed recently that under my left breast near the sternum it has gotten sore. I also have had chest, back and arm pain on and off over the past year. My doctor sent me for a mammogram and I also got an ultrasound at the same time. Both were negative for any problems. Do you think my breast implants are a cause of my problems.? Can a breast implant release harmful chemicals or toxins? I want tio keep my breast implants but if they are dangerous then I want them out.
A: It is impossible to say with an certainty that there is a relationship of the symptoms you are having and your breast implants. What we do know for sure is that breast implants do not release toxins, poisons, or any other harmful chemicals. While you have had a good breast screening work-up, mammograms and ultrasound are not 100% accurate when it comes to detecting an implant rupture. If anything, that is where my suspicion would lie as it relates to your left breast pain. If it persists or increases in severity, I would consider getting an MRI which is the most accurate test we have to detect breast implant rupture.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: breast implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, silicone breast implant rupture Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Monday, October 3rd, 2011
Q: Dr. Eppley, I am in need of some breast help! I have had three children, all whom I have nursed. I have also lost 45 lbs over the past year through diet and exercise. This has left my breasts saggy. I know that I need a breast, that is without question. The only question I really have is whether I can get by with out breast implants.Do you think that’s possible with how my breasts look? I’m happy with the size of my breasts when I wear a good bra (currently 40D) but unhappy with how deflated and saggy they are without a bra.
A: Breast lifts do an excellent job of lifting and tightening the shape of the breast mound. By keeping the same amount of breast tissue and lifting and tightening the ‘bag’ which contains them, this does create a less saggy and more round breast. This is particularly true in the bottom pole of the breast and less so in the upper pole of the breast. In the beginning right after breast lift surgery, the upper pole of the breast is quite round and full. But as the tissues relax and settle, much of the upper pole fullness will be lost. If one doesn’t ming some rebound flattening of the upper breast pole, then I think you would be fine with a breast lift alone. However, if your goal is to have a rounder and more full upper breast pole long-term, then a small implant will be needed to accomplish that breast shape goal.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: breast implants, breast lift, dr barry eppley, indianapolis Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Monday, August 29th, 2011
When the subject of breast implants or breast enlargement surgery comes up, many people immediately think about size. Large breasts that create eye-catching cleavage are what comes to many minds, a concept that has not been helped over the past two decades from celebrities ranging from Pamela Anderson to Heidi Montag of more recent note.
The reality of breast implant surgery, however, is far from this image. There are certainly a minority of women who do want this look. But the vast majority of women who choose to have breast implants are much more interested in finding the right size for their body and not to have overpowering breasts that become the focal point of their appearance.
Most breast augmentation patients are average women who simply want to look good in clothes and sport attire. I have seen many women who have told me that they are embarrassed to wear a bathing and won’t go to the pool or beach with their family. While breast underdevelopment is the most common motivation for getting implants, there are numerous other reasons. These include such breast conditions as postpregnancy sagging, asymmetrical breasts, body proportioning, breast asymmetry and reconstruction after mastectomies.
Pregnancy and nursing can have an adverse effect on a woman’s breast shape and size causing sagging and, almost always, a change in the amount of breast tissue. Many women are unaware that it is completely normal to lose breast tissue after pregnancy, a phenomenon known as involution. For some women who have had multiple pregnancies, they lose all of the breast tissue they originally had. When combined with stretched out skin, the change in a woman’s breasts can be deflating for their self-image as well. These are women who simply want to return to their pre-baby size and shape.
There are many women who have breast asymmetry where one breast is larger or different in shape than the other. In some cases the breast size difference can be as much as a cup size, sometimes even more. For women so afflicted, finding a bra to fit comfortably and properly is not as easy as going to Victoria Secret’s and pulling a good fit off the rack. Often they are forced to add padding to create a more even look in their clothing.
One of the most recognized and easily understandable reasons for implants is in breast reconstruction. The physical and emotional devastation of going through any form of a lumpectomy or mastectomy procedure can be softened knowing that an immediate or even a delayed reconstruction can be done. While numerous forms of breast reconstruction exist, including flaps that form the breast mound out of your tissues, implants remain the backbone of how most breasts are recreated.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: breast augmentation, breast implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis Posted in Newspaper Articles | No Comments »
Tuesday, May 31st, 2011
A common question that some women face today is…are they for real? With more women than ever undergoing breast augmentation, this is not a far-fetched question. It may be inappropriate to ask but the statistical reality is one may be more right than wrong many of the times. According to statistics from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the number of women who have had breast augmentation had risen nearly 40% over the past decade. In 2010, nearly 300,000 American women received cosmetic breast enhancement.
One other trend in breast augmentation is a noticeable size difference. Many plastic surgeons have commented that women are asking for bigger breasts than they were a decade ago. Historically women would usually ask to go a cup size bigger. Today it is not uncommon for a women to want two or three cups bigger, particularly the younger they are. Women state they want to get a good value for their investment and they want to make a noticeable difference in their clothed appearance.
What accounts for these trends in breast augmentation? By far I would say that it is simply more accepted than ever before. As we enter the upcoming decade of 2010 to 2020, this is the beginning of the third generation of women who have had access to breast implants for cosmetic enlargement. It is a normal part of society now and younger women’s mothers and soon grandmothers will have had the procedure.
Breast augmentation has a track history of safety as well as effectiveness. Despite the hullaboo of what transpired in the early 1990s, the procedure has been proven to cause no medical problems or makes people systemically sick.. While it is far from a perfect procedure, because after all it is an implant in the body, its complications are local in nature and often aesthetic in significance.
The social trends of today play a major role in its popularity as well. Just go through the checkout counter at the local grocery store and the magazines are full of articles about celebrities who have had or are assumed to have had some form of plastic surgery. Many of these are women actors and performers who have enhanced their top half. The influence of these magazine, TV shows and now the internet have made it seem that having breast enhancement is now the new norm.
There are more choices in breast implants today than ever before. Since 2006, both saline and silicone implants are available in not only differing sizes but projection and styles as well. With the potential for gummy bear breast implants to be available perhaps later this year, increasing implant options appeal to an even broader spectrum of women. Just like the many aisles in a drugstore, multiple options for a single product line result in more sales.
The rise in breast augmentation is a result of greater societal acceptance, safety of the devices, influence of famous people, and a wide variety of implant options. I suspect the upcoming decade will see the number of implanted women continue to rise.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: breast augmentation, breast implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis Posted in Newspaper Articles | No Comments »
Wednesday, April 13th, 2011
Q: Do you do fat injections for breast augmentations? I read your article and have already been in to be seen and I am planning to have surgery in June. Is this a possibility for me? I did not know about this before the time I had my breast augmentation consultation or I would have asked.
A: Fat injections for breast augmentation (FIBA) at this time is a procedure that is in a state of development. The reliability of the procedure and whom is the best candidate for it will take time to know better. The fairest statement one can make about the FIBA procedure is that the result can not guaranteed (breast volume and shape), can cost more than traditional breast implants, and may likely take two or three injection sessions spaced 3 to 6 months apart to get the desired result. Then there are the very real risks of fat necrosis and lumps throughout the breast.
To the best we know at this time, FIBA may be a reasonable alternative for a woman whose breast size goal is modest (B cup, maybe small C) and is willing to assume multiple procedures and the associated risks. This is not to mention that one must have enough fat to harvest on one’s body for transfer.
Compared to the success of traditional breast implants, FIBA is not for the vast majority of women considering breast enlargement today. It may be a different story (or not) five or ten years from now.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: breast implants, dr barry eppley, fat injection breast augmentation, indianapolis, plastic surgery of the breasts Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Monday, January 24th, 2011
Q: I want to have breast implants done. I am not happy with the way my breasts look. But I have lupus and am not sure that I can have this procedure with this medical condition.
A: Whether breast augmentation with the medical history of lupus is a good idea would depend on what the extent and how symptomatic this autoimmune disease is in you. Do you have any known healing problems as a result of your lupus? Have you had surgery in the past and did you have any problems with healing or infections after surgery? Are you on any steroids or other immunosuppressive medications? What symptoms do you currently have from your lupus? What are your titer levels of ANA and other blood tests from your doctor?
Ultimately, what your doctor or rheumatologist would say about your lupus condition would have a lot to say about the adviseability of breast augmentation for you. Despite the past allegations that silicone breast implants cause autoimmune disease from the 1990s, that has now long been disproven.
The issue is are you more prone to breast implant complications from your lupus? Infection risk in the short term and capsular contracture in the longer term are the issues. If you have skin problems, such as banding and contractures, than you would be likely to get problematic breast implant capsules. If not and your lupus is stable and relatively asymptomatic, then breast augmentation may be a satisfactory procedure for you.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis Indiana
Tags: breast augmentation in lupus, breast implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Monday, December 6th, 2010
The holiday season is full of strenuous activities and one of these is travel. Anyone who has traveled by air in the past year knows that security is getting ever more scrutinizing. But of all the things that could be potentially hazardous to an airplane and its passengers, who knew that breast implants would be one of them?
Recently, a flight attendant’s breast prosthesis (external) became an unfortunate source of controversy that illustrates the growing conflict between one’s privacy and that of air travel security. New TSA screening rules include the use of either full-body scanners or pat-downs for selected passengers, the inclusion criteria of which is not clear. Incredulously, the flight attendant was made to remove her implant as part of the screening process.. This event has understandably raised concerns amongst some plastic surgery patients about their right to having to reveal their most intimate of physical information.
If you are traveling and have any implants, breast or otherwise, do you have to tell screeners that you have implants? According to the TSA website, “It is recommended (but not required) that you advise the Security Officer that you have an implanted medical device, and where that implant is located. If you have an implanted medical device that you would like to remain private and confidential, ask the Security Officer to please be discreet when assisting you through the screening process.”
While having breast implants is a personal matter, stepping onto a public airline mandates that you may be asked to give up all your rights to privacy. This offends all of us but this issue has long had a legal precedent. A similar issue confronted us decades ago in the height of the first wave of terrorist activity in airlines…the introduction of the need to pass through a metal detector. Similar concerns were raised then and the highest court in the land ruled that making you do so was not unconstitutional.
The body scanner has the ability to not only see breast implants but many other types of implants as well. From facial implants, chemotherapy ports, shunts for water on the brain, any artificial orthopedic joint replacements and even testicular implants. No one knows the actual statistics but I would estimate that at least one out of every three people traveling have some indwelling implant. Pat downs, of course, can tell almost none of these internal issues but they are infinitely more offensive.
I am certain that the TSA doesn’t care if you have had breast augmentation. But you can argue that their concern about them has some validity. Intelligence reports have come forth that indicates that terrorists may be having women implanted with breast prostheses filled with explosive material. This would be all too easy to do and is a potential reality. It only requires a method of activation, an indwelling receiver to make it work. And this is exactly what a body scanner can hopefully pick up.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: airport screening, breast implants, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, plastic surgery Posted in Newspaper Articles | No Comments »
|
|
|
|