Posts Tagged ‘botox’
Tuesday, July 13th, 2010
Q: Hi, I just would like to know if BOTOX and DYSPORT would lift a droopy upper eyelid? Thank you.
A: Both Botox and Dysport are equivalent injectable drugs that induce muscle paralysis where injected and weakness in the surrounding region. They are superb at stopping that undesireable frowning between your eyebrows or those crow’s feet wrinkles at the side of your eyes. By weakening the overactive forehead muscles, many people may experience a bit of a browlift. This occurs because the paralyzed forehead muscles no longer pull down on the eyebrow, allowing it to raise a little higher.
It is logical to assume that a similar effect would occur in a droopy eyelid. But that assumption would be wrong. A droopy eyelid, known as eyelid ptosis, is the result of a weak levator muscle. The levator muscle is the primary muscle that moves the upper eyelid. When it is weak for whatever reason or is partially detached from the tarsus of the upper eyelid, the lid margin will hang down lower. It becomes noticeable when the lid margin comes down lower on the iris and it only takes a few millimeters lower to be evident.
Since Botox and Dysport paralyze muscle, it would actually make a droopy lid worse. In fact, one of the most dreaded esthetic complications of Botox and Dysport is a droopy eyelid when it inadvertently diffuses into the upper eyelid from above if it is injected too close.
Eyelid ptosis can only be improved by surgery. The amount of lid droop and its cause determines what type of ptosis repair technique is needed.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: botox, dr barry eppley, dysport, eyelid ptosis, indianapolis, plastic surgery
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Wednesday, July 7th, 2010
Q : I have heard that regular use of Botox and injectable fillers over years can reduce the need to do them so often. Is that true or just wishful thinking?
A: Recent research presented at plastic surgery meetings have indicated that such a ‘rumor’ may have some truth to it. A study out of Oregon looked at women between the ages of 30 and 50 who received Botox every four months for two years. After that time, the frequency of their injections could be adjusted down to every six months and still have sustained satisfying results.
The same observation has been seen with injectable fillers. If the treatments are done long enough, they seem to be needed less often. One possible explanation may be the filler’s ability to stimulate new collagen.
Is less Botox and fillers really needed if they are done long enough? One of the problems is assessing long-term effectiveness is that it is very subjective and not able to be quantified objectively. Can facial muscles be re-trained by long-term Botox? Can injectable fillers create new collagen? Or are these apparent effects more of a function of the patient being able to tolerate a few wrinkles longer or less full lips or deeper nasolabial folds between injection sessions? The economics of regular injection treatments can certainly make patients space out their injection treatment intervals and still be satisfied.
It is tempting to want to believe that Botox and filler’s effects have some long-term benefits after they wear off…but it is far from a proven fact.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: botox, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, injectable fillers, plastic surgery
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Wednesday, June 30th, 2010
Q: I have a deep vertical line in between my eyebrows that is still noticeable despite having Botox injections. I was wondering if endoscopic browlift could correct this. Im only 27 years old. Please help.
A: The development of vertical wrinkles between your eyebrows, known as the glabellar area, is common and is the result of excessive muscle activity. There are a set of six paired muscles that affect the glabella area and create what has been described as a number system of galbellar wrinkles or furrows. As the popular ad goes, are you a 1, 11 or 111? These numbers describe whether one has one, two or three vertical glabellar wrinkles.
The first approach for glabellar wrinkles is Botox which will be highly effective for most people. For many the wrinkling is completely or nearly completely gone by this temporary muscle paralyzing treatment. For those with more deeply etched glabellar furrows, Botox will soften it to some degree but may not reduce it enough for the person’s satisfaction. This is the result of the skin being ‘etched’ or having a permanent v-shaped change in the skin. Muscle paralysis will not change permanent deformation of the skin.
An endoscopic browlift will not create a better effect than that of Botox because it works on the muscle only. It may help decrease the long-term need for Botox and, rarely, the need for Botox at all.
A companion treatment for the deep glabellar furrow is some type of soft tissue fill. Usually this is an injectable filler but its effect will only be temporary. More permanent options include the threading of an allograft collagen dermis material or actual synthetic implant. (e.g., Advanta)
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: botox, dr barry eppley, endoscopic brwlift, glabellar furrow, glabellar wrinkling, indianapolis, plastic surgery
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Friday, June 11th, 2010
Q: I am interested in a brow lift or botox treatment…maybe a facelift. I am 43 years old and I believe I look ten years older. Do you know if I could try one procedure now and then gradually work up to a progressive series of surgeries?
A: The wonderful thing about the many procedures for facial rejuvenation is that both small and big changes can be done. And the procedures can be customized to how much one wants to do, how much one wants to spend, and how much recovery one can allow. Since facial aging is a progressive phenomenon, younger patients will need smaller procedures while bigger changes are reserved for those with more loose skin and wrinkles.
Since you have never had any of these cosmetic procedures before, it is understandable that one often does not know where to start. To ‘put your toe in the water’ so to speak, doing something non-surgical like Botox or injectable fillers is a good way to start. One can venture ‘further into the pool’ with laser treatments and even facelift surgery at a later date. A progressive approach to facial aging treatments is both reasonable and prudent.
Always start with the facial concerns that bothers you the most. To get started, it is helpful to meet with a plastic surgeon and have an educational session about what is appropriate now and what may be beneficial in the future.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Indianapolis, Indiana
Tags: botox, dr barry eppley, facelift, facial aging, facial plastic surgery, indianapolis, plastic surgery
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Monday, May 17th, 2010
Celebrities who undergo plastic surgery without question have a compelling influence on the general population, particularly those under the age of 40. One has to look no further than the checkout aisle in the grocery store to see how celebrity visibility is thrust upon us. From these consumer magazines to numerous television shows, anyone with a Hollywood connection is tracked and speculated upon about their cosmetic surgery, even if they have never had it. The media’s desire to push these cosmetic surgery tales of the stars fuels the public’s obsession with discovering the secrets to what keeps the beautiful and famous looking so.
While the star’s experiences may fascinate, they do little to actually educate. It is easy to confuse entertainment with reality because it is simply more interesting. Take the recent case of 23 year-old Heidi Mondag who had numerous cosmetic procedures done to satisfy her narcissistic and career agendas. While she may have had a lot of procedures, they were all quite small in scope. Most of her procedures were really ‘nip and tucks’ and not major overalls. After all, how many physical problems could a young person really have particularly given her appearance beforehand? But this is not how the media interpreted her surgery. Rather it was made to sound like it was a great undertaking and required supernormal surgical skills to complete.
These ‘tweakments’ are largely what is fueling the increasing visibility of plastic surgery. Botox, injectable fillers, lasers and minor skin lifts of the face have created a whole new set of treatment options that did not exist just a decade ago. While a 23 year-old partaking of this cosmetic menu does border on the overly self-indulgent, those in their late 30s and 40s have a more significant purpose. Fending back the early signs of aging is proving to be a more effective strategy than awaiting the day when major plastic surgery is needed. While my mother may have waited until retirement to wage the battle against the effects of time, today’s middle agers understandably what to look better and more rested now.
What is unique about these minimal procedures is that most of them are fueled and promoted by the cosmetic device and pharmaceutical industry. Plastic surgeons have taken a back seat to the promotions and marketing that billion-dollar-in-sales companies can do. The once retail approach to cosmetic and beauty products has expanded to include drugs and surgery. Targeting consumers through popular magazine and internet strategies, rebate coupons for Botox and eyelash stimulants are widely available as well as even franchise surgery for facelifts. Breast implant sizer kits are mailed to prospective patient’s homes with incentives for other procedures packed inside. Plastic surgeons collectively spend an insignificant fraction on marketing compared to that of the corporate world. This wave of industry’s promotion for profit and media attention for sales is why most people today know something about cosmetic enhancement and why it is now mainstream.
But like all entrepreneurial endeavors, making a profit and driving sales does produce some good byproducts that have wide benefit. Like the old commercial slogan from decades ago, there is ‘better living through modern chemistry’.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: botox, cosmetic surgery, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, injectable fillers, plastic surgery
Posted in Newspaper Articles | No Comments »
Tuesday, May 11th, 2010
Q: I have read numerous blogs that talk about the value of facial exercises. With so many debates on this subject, I wonder if there is any benefit to doing facial exercises to tone up the face. Plastic surgery seems so drastic.
A: Much has been written over the past fifty years about using exercise to lift up a sagging aging face…or to prevent it from happening. This concept is not new. I have an original copy of a book entitled ‘Lifting Up Your Face’ from 1951. The more recent books that I have seen today in the book stores are beautifully done, and even have their own DVDs in the cover, but they are just modern re-inventions of this original concept.
It is certainly reasonable to do anything to avoid actual surgery, if it has some benefit. The problem that I have with facial exercising is three-fold. First, most of the signs of facial aging that are bothersome to people (appearance of jowls, loose skin in the neck, dropping brows, etc) are not muscular in origin. They did not occur because the muscles were loose and sagging. Anatomically, they are the result of the skin and the subcutaneous fat becoming loose and sliding off of the deeper tissues. That is not something that muscle tightening, even if it were possible with facial exercises, can really treat or prevent. Secondly, all facial wrinkles that develop are the result of muscle movement. That is why Botox is so popular, because it decreases this wrinkle-causing muscle movement. Moving those muscles a lot more through facial exercising will likely increase, not decrease the age signs of wrinkling. Lastly, I have yet to see adequate before and after photographs of believeable results from any facial exercising program. The photographs shown are never standardized. There are always some subtle changes in angle and lighting that can make a big difference in how the result looks. We know this very well in plastic surgery. It is very easy, intentional or not, to have an after result that appears to show a facial change that does not really exist.
For the sake of discussion, however, let’s us assume that there is some minor benefit to facial execising. In most patient cases, it is likely that the result would not be adequate…a lot of effort for a minor improvement. With todays’ minimally invasive and limited downtime facial procedures, they quickly surpass what exercising could do and require less effort. Plastic surgery does not have to be so drastic, one can get a few ‘tweakments’ that can make a real visible difference.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: botox, dr barry eppley, facial exercises, indianapolis, injectable fillers, plastic surgery
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Wednesday, April 21st, 2010
Q : Which is better for my laugh lines, Botox or fillers?
A: It is very common that Botox and injectable fillers are confused as to what they do. Because both are administered by a needle and are used in the face, many assume that they do similar things. In fact, they are quite different both in chemical composition and the effects that they create and in how they are used.
Botox works its magic by being a muscle weakening or paralyzing agent. It is primarily used in the forehead and around the eyes to decrease unwanted expressions caused by overactive muscles. As a result, Botox (and now Dysport) is really a ‘northern facial’ procedure. It effectively reduces horizontal forehead lines, furrows between the eyebrows, and crow’s feet around the eyes.
Injectable fillers (there are now over a dozen commercially available brands) work by adding instant volume to deep wrinkles and folds as well as enhancing the size of the lips. By adding a material under the skin or into the lips, the outer skin and lips is pushed outward. Injectable fillers are primarily used around the mouth making it a ‘southern facial’ procedure.
While there are crossover areas in the face where Botox and fillers are otherwise used, they are largely separated in application to these northern and southern hemispheres.
Folds around the mouth are commonly referred to as laugh lines. When one smiles, indentations or wrinkles are created beyond the sides of the mouth. They are different than the nasolabial folds which run from the side of the nose to outside of the corners of the mouth which are situated above the laugh lines. Injectable fillers can be effective at softening one’s laugh lines.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: botox, dr barry eppley, dysport, indianapolis, injectable fillers, laugh lines, plastic surgery
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Wednesday, April 7th, 2010
INSIGHTS FROM ‘BEHIND THE NEEDLE’
In the past, plastic surgery was all about having operations to reverse the effects of aging on the face. Time was, once you could no longer stand to see yourself in the mirror or in pictures…facelifts, eye tucks and the like became appealing with all of the associated swelling and bruising, recovery, and expense.
Over the past ten years, non-surgical injectable treatments have become popular for men and women of all ages…and have become part of mainstream society in ways that rival Starbucks, energy drinks, and iPhones. The concepts of muscle paralysis, plumping fillers, and fat dissolving agents have made it possible to have smooth foreheads, fuller lips and softer laugh lines, and maybe some subtle tightening of the jowls and neck in a few simple visits to the doctor’s office. Unlike surgery, injectable facial treatments are as much about the prevention of the effects of aging as they are about reversing what has already taken place.
Along with this explosion of available injectable treatments have come the inevitable, unbelievable marketing claims, and so-called ‘expert’ injectors. But, like much of what you may read on the internet, in popular magazines, and hear in commercials , what can you really believe? How do you separate reality from marketing hype? How can you decide where-or if-injectable treatments are for you? And if so, which ones??
Dr. Barry Eppley, board-certified plastic surgeon of Indianapolis, takes you on a broad tour of every injectable treatment option. Providing insight into Botox®, the many injectable fillers, and lipodissolve, Dr. Eppley provides the current science behind the treatments, and talks plainly about his experience and observations. These insights from ‘behind the needle’ about these incredibly popular injectable treatments are available nowhere else.
Whether you are just researching Botox® or fillers, or are a seasoned expert with an upcoming consultation about the next new option, Dr. Eppley gets you ready for Injecting Youth!
Tags: botox, dr barry eppley, facial injections, indianapolis, injectable beauty treatments, injectable fillers, plastic surgery
Posted in Books | No Comments »
Tuesday, March 30th, 2010
Almost everyone has now heard of the facial wrinkle treatment, Botox. While some may not know exactly what it is really good for, its recognition and popularity is because it simply works. When it comes to softening facial expressions, it does something that even surgery can’t do.
Many misconceptions exist, however, about Botox (and now Dysport) and it is time to reveal some of its secrets. Here are some facts about its use that are not commonly known.
Botox is a poison and can be quite lethal if the dose is high enough. It is administered in units which originally stood for mouse units. A unit was the dose of Botox that could kill a mouse. Fortunately, there is a big difference in size between a mouse and a human. To poison a human, it is estimated that it would take about 25,000 or more units to do so. The average dose for wrinkles is around 20 to 30 units, so it is well within the margin of safety. (mathematically, cosmetic dose units are a mere 0.001% of the doses that could be fatal). Cosmetic injections are precisely placed 2 to 4 unit doses in select facial area.
While Botox is touted for a lot of facial uses, it is largely a ‘northern’ face procedure. The areas of the forehead and around the eyes accounts for much of its use. Weakening of the muscles between the eyebrows, in the forehead, and at the sides of the eyes produces the desired effect of less frowning, a more relaxed forehead, and less lines around the eyes. While some do use it down south around the mouth, it is not effective as a primary wrinkle reducer in that area. A little too much Botox there can affect the way you smile.
Botox injections do not produce immediate results. It usually takes one week or more to see its effects. This is because it blocks the release of chemicals from the nerve endings that cross over to stimulate the muscle fibers to which it is attached. Because there is a supply of chemicals in the nerve endings to start, they must first be depleted. As a result, the muscle will work normally for a few days before it begins to weaken as its ‘gas supply’ diminishes.
The effectiveness of Botox can vary from one doctor to another or from one treatment center to another. This seems initially unusual because one of the benefits of a prescription drug is that it has been tested and approved for the uniformity of its effects. But Botox differs from a pill and many other prescription medications. It comes as a dry powder and must be formulated or reconstituted prior to treatment. How well it works, therefore, is affected by how it is mixed and how long ago it was prepared. It is designed to be mixed according to the manufacturers recommendation in a very specific way. (2.5ml of saline per vial) and it should be used either immediately or within a few days after preparation. But treatment centers vary on how they mix it and how quickly they can use it. You have no way of knowing if you are getting diluted or old Botox. If it doesn’t seem to be working well or lasting very long, this could be the reason.
Like all drugs, there is an effective dose to Botox or a ‘sweet spot’ at which it works well. What you want as a patient is to find the Minimum Effective Dose as well as the right injection spots. You may regularly be getting 40 units in the forehead are, for example, when 32 may work just as well. More Botox than necessary does not make it work better or any longer. Don’t be afraid to ask your injector to adjust the does or injection locations to see if the results improve…or become less.
Botox and Dysport have a very consistent duration of effect of around 4 months. Repeat treatments, unfortunately, do not make it last longer. But some patients feel that it does. This is likely an effect of muscle re-education, a chemical training if you will. It may take your body awhile to begin using those muscles again if they have been weakened repeatedly. Conversely, most people will not build up tolerance or immunity to Botox. But a few patients say that they have and resistance to any drug is always possible. One can than switch to Dysport which has a slightly different molecular structure.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: botox, dr barry eppley, dysport, facial wrinkle reduction, indianapolis, plastic surgery
Posted in Newspaper Articles | No Comments »
|
|
|
|