Archive for April, 2010
Thursday, April 22nd, 2010
Q: I am currently a nurse in the US Marines stationed in Afghanistan and will be visiting home for a month in September later this year. I’m interested in breast augmentation surgery and have thought having this done for some time. Do I get a discount because of the Patriot Program? I am also interested in having a Skype consultation which would be great for me given the distance. That way I could get everything arranged so when I return I can have my surgery within a day or two after my arrival.
A: The Patriot Plastic Surgery program has had a good response since we have offered it over the past year. I have gotten numerous inquiries from around the world, particularly from overseas in Europe and Afghanistan. I am happy to offer what we can to a very deserving group of men and women who are doing far more for our country that I ever could.
Because of the age group (ages 18 to 35) that make up a significant percent of the military, most requests have been for body procedures such as breast augmentation and liposuction and face procedures such as rhinoplasty, otoplasty, and chin augmentation.
Many of these military patients come in for surgery during their leave back to the United States or from where they are stationed here in the United States. The use of Skype as a free internet method of discussions and consultations makes the consideration and coordination of surgery possible from afar. By using the video feature of Skype, one can have a good conversation about potential surgery almost as if one was in the office. I often review pictures that are sent to me before these Skype discussions to help focus the conversation. Patients can then have surgery arranged and come in and see me the day before for a real hands-on evaluation and final discussion prior to surgery the next day.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: dr barry eppley, indianapolis, military plastic surgery, patriot plastic surgery program, plastic sugery
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Thursday, April 22nd, 2010
Q : I have a stomach pouch that I just can’t stand. After my third child, I just could not get rid of this loose skin and fat that hangs below my belly button. Despite really watching what I eat and trying to exercise more, it won’t come off. It hasn’t budged at all in the past year. I think I may need some type of a tummy tuck. What is the difference between a mini- and a full tummy tuck?
A: Any form of a tummy tuck, also known as an abdominoplasty, removes skin and fat as well as tightens the rectus muscles. The removal of skin and the muscle tightening is what separates it from a liposuction procedure.
Most types of tummy tucks are horizontal full-thickness excisions of skin and fat down to the abdominal muscle wall. The difference between a mini- and a full tummy tuck is in the amount and location of this cut out. A mini-tummy tuck performs it below the belly button while a full tummy tuck goes above the belly button. As a result, the full tummy tuck has a longer final scar as well as a circumferential scar around the ‘new’ belly button. The mini-tummy tuck just has a less long low horizontal scar only.
A patient’s decision between a mini- and full tummy tuck must consider a variety of factors. How long a scar can one tolerate? How much loose skin and fat does one have? Is there loose and creapy skin around the belly button? Are there any rolls of skin above the belly button? How flat does one want the stomach area to be?
The simplistic answer to deciding between a mini- and full tummy tuck is what the stomach looks like above the belly button. Only a full tummy tuck can smooth out loose skin and fat above that central abdominal marker.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: abdominoplasty, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, mini-tummy tuck, plastic surgery, tummy tuck
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Wednesday, April 21st, 2010
Q: I have seen your chin osteotomy video on Youtube. I’m from Vietnam. May I have your advice? I really need it. I had my chin done about 6 weeks ago. My chin bone was cut and moved forward about 8mm and now I have 3 small pieces of stainless steel in my chin bone. (like small rings). My doctor says that it’s ok to have those stainless steel in my chin for the rest of my life. Is that right? And the sad thing is that I regret that I had my chin cut. In fact, I just wish I hadn’t had the surgery. Should I now have my chin bone moved back? Can everything be like it was before or would my chin just be weaker? Can I get rid of that stainless steel in my chin if I have my chin moved back to its place just like it was before?
A: I have never had the experience in my Indianapolis plastic surgery practice of a patient ever regretting having their chin bone moved forward. This is a completely avoidable concern by using computer imaging prior to surgery. The chin is one of the two (the nose is the other) most easily and accurately computer imaged areas of the face. You can know precisely before surgery what it will likely look like afterwards. I am assuming that the regret from this patient is that they do not like the ‘new look’. Maybe it is moved too far forward or maybe it shouldn’t have been done at all. This is clearly a preventable case of surgical remorse.
While today’s facial bone surgery uses very small titanium plates and screws, the use of stainless steel wire (rings) is historic and perfectly safe. The use of bone wiring is still done in many parts of the world due to its lower cost. There is no concern with them there nor should they ever need to be removed.
Just as the chin can be cut and brought forward, it can be brought back to where it once was. This is much easier and quicker than the original surgery. If that is what one wants to do, I would do it within three months of the original surgery since there is minimal bone healing at this point. Chin osteotomies usually take at least six months to become completely healed back together. The use of wires or plates does have to be done to hold the bone together so it heals properly. The key to moving the chin back is to tighten the mentalis muscle back together well. Since it has been stretched out and expanded, it needs to be shortened and tightened once the bone is moved back and set. If not, you will end up with soft tissue sag known as a witch’s chin deformity.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: chin osteotomy, chin setback, chin surgery, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, plastic surgery
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Wednesday, April 21st, 2010
Q: I have numerous small lipomas on my forearms and legs. How effective is lipossolve on these?
A: Lipomas are benign fat tumors that develop for unknown reasons. It is common that one may eventually develop one or two lipomas over their lifetime. Usually they are small and can develop anywhere from the scalp down to the legs. I have never seen them in the hands or feet, probably because there is very little fat there. They are harmless but sometimes they can be uncomfortable. Rarely, a patient may present with multiple and newly developing lipomas at several different areas of the body. This is known as a condition of familial lipomatosis in which the patient will continue to develop many (dozens to hundreds of lipomas) throughout their lifetime.
Lipomas are easy to remove surgically and they can literally ‘pop out’ through a small incision. But they will leave a small scar from the incision and, at the least, require a local anesthetic for removal. Depending on where they are located and how big they are, they may require more than just a local anesthetic. If there is only one or two, then surgical removal is reasonable. When one has many, surgery becomes more arduous and less appealing. Liposuction is not an option for lipomas.
There is no proven or FDA-approved method of injectable lipoma treatment. The chemical concoction, known as Lipodissolve, has had widespread use for injectable fat reduction for cosmetic purposes over the past decade. Because it is intended for fat lipolysis (dissolving), it is no surprise that it has been reported to be used for the non-surgical treatment of lipomas. It is simple and quick to do and, in my limited experience of a handful of patients, has been effective. It may require more than one injection to make the lipoma go away but most of the time it will work. There will be the typical swelling of the injection site for a week or so after treatment.
Potential patients needs to understand that neither the solution or treatment method have ever been through formal FDA testing and evaluation. Reports of its use and effectiveness for lipomas are anectodal, not scientifically proven.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: dr barry eppley, indianapolis, injectable lipoma treatment, lipodissolve, lipomas
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Wednesday, April 21st, 2010
Q: I would like to know what the rate of satisfaction is amongst patients that have had chin osteotomies or chin implants when actually they should have had lower advancement jaw surgery? Are they happy with their appearance or do they feel their top teeth extend out too much when they smile?
A: The short answer is yes. But that answer needs a more detailed explanation. The key is proper patient selection and understanding that a chin implant or osteotomy for a mandibular deficient patient is a compromise operation. It is treating the symptoms of the problem and not the primary problem. In other words, one is camouflaging the real defect and accepting whatever (if any) functional problems that may exist.
The idea treatment for a mandibular deficient patient with a malocclusion (Class bite relationship where the lower teeth are behind the upper…an overbite) is orthognathic surgery. Specifically, a mandibular advancement osteotomy with preparatory and postoperative orthodontics. While this is a very effective operation, it requires a commitment of several years of orthodontics, an operation, and the risks of damage to the inferior alveolar nerve. (some permanent change in the feeling of the lip and chin) The decision for mandibular advancement surgery, therefore, should be based on one’s age and the degree of malocclusion. You must balance the risks vs the benefits like any surgery. If one is young with more than several millimeters of overbite, this should seriously be considered and even done. In patients who are older, often with even more significant overbites, the enthusiasm for this surgical effort is often not there. Camouflaging the jaw defect and getting a better profile and improved facial proportions through a simpler chin implant or osteotomy has a lot more appeal.
In my Indianapolis plastic surgery experience, I have never had any unhappiness amongst patients who has chosen the isolated chin route. Nor has it been reported to me that their upper teeth stick out too far when they smile.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: chin implant, chin osteotomy, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, jaw surgery, plastic surgery
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Wednesday, April 21st, 2010
Q : Which is better for my laugh lines, Botox or fillers?
A: It is very common that Botox and injectable fillers are confused as to what they do. Because both are administered by a needle and are used in the face, many assume that they do similar things. In fact, they are quite different both in chemical composition and the effects that they create and in how they are used.
Botox works its magic by being a muscle weakening or paralyzing agent. It is primarily used in the forehead and around the eyes to decrease unwanted expressions caused by overactive muscles. As a result, Botox (and now Dysport) is really a ‘northern facial’ procedure. It effectively reduces horizontal forehead lines, furrows between the eyebrows, and crow’s feet around the eyes.
Injectable fillers (there are now over a dozen commercially available brands) work by adding instant volume to deep wrinkles and folds as well as enhancing the size of the lips. By adding a material under the skin or into the lips, the outer skin and lips is pushed outward. Injectable fillers are primarily used around the mouth making it a ‘southern facial’ procedure.
While there are crossover areas in the face where Botox and fillers are otherwise used, they are largely separated in application to these northern and southern hemispheres.
Folds around the mouth are commonly referred to as laugh lines. When one smiles, indentations or wrinkles are created beyond the sides of the mouth. They are different than the nasolabial folds which run from the side of the nose to outside of the corners of the mouth which are situated above the laugh lines. Injectable fillers can be effective at softening one’s laugh lines.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: botox, dr barry eppley, dysport, indianapolis, injectable fillers, laugh lines, plastic surgery
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Tuesday, April 20th, 2010
Q: What is best way to build up an African-American nose that is short and small?
A: The overall shape of the African-American nose is often that of being broader and less projecting than that of a more Roman or aquiline nose shape. As a result, one of the key considerations in the rhinoplasty management of this nasal shape is to build up the bridge or dorsal line of the nose and improve tip projection and definition. Such an approach is most likely what is meant by having a nose that is ‘short and small’.
An type of augmentative rhinoplasty requires the addition of some form of graft or internal support structure to lift up the roof (skin) and reshape it. How much graft volume is needed determines the best way to do it. Each patient will be different in this regard. But this discussion always comes down to whether one wants to use a synthetic implant vs. cartilage.
The historic debate between allograft vs. autograft in rhinoplasty is an old one. Each has their own advantages and disadvantages with surgeon advocates on both sides. But the differences between the two are always the same. An implant is a lot easier to do (off-the-shelf) for both patient and surgeon and comes in a variety of ready-made shapes to create small or big ghraft needs. The price that is paid for this ease is the increased risks of infection and long-term implant extrusion and problems. Cartilage grafting is much harder to do, necessitates a donor site and require more surgical skill and experience to do well. But the risk of infection is much lower and there is no risk of any long-term extrusion or rejection problems.
Which is best must be determined with the patient through a thorough consultation and educational session. Both methods can be successful but the patient with the plastic surgeon must weigh the benefits and risks of each approach. When possible and acceptable, I prefer cartilage grafting because of its long-term benefits.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: african-american rhinoplasty, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, plastic surgery, rhinoplasty
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Tuesday, April 20th, 2010
Q: I am interested in getting liposuction done on my stomach and flanks but am confused about the different types that I have read about. There appears to be regular liposuction, ultrasonic, laser, water jet…and and even something like ultrasonic done from the outside without surgery. Which type of liposuction is the best?
A: Liposuction has come a long way since its first introduction in the United States in 1981. It is a two-part process during surgery that involves the first phase of breaking up the fat and a second phase of removing or suctioning it out. All of the advancements in liposuction have come forth for the first phase, different methods to help loosen up the fat for evacuation.
One highly touted liposuction method that is neither new or novel is that of tumescence. This is an original advance in liposuction that began to be used in the mid-1980s and is part of every liposuction procedure today. Prior to doing phase one particulation, a special solution is first instilled that provides numbness to the treated area and helps cut down the extreme bleeding that would otherwise occur. This does make it possible for small areas of liposuction to be done under local anesthesia, but is also used even when you are going to sleep for the procedure.
Most of the advancements in liposuction that are highly marketed and promoted on the internet are relatively new. Whether one method really offers any improvement over the other has yet to be proven no matter what the endorsement and advertisement says. My current preference is for laser liposuction, branded as Smartlipo. We all know that fat is very sensitive to heat and can be melted as is observed during cooking. So the concept of heating up a treated area makes sense and is something that can really be felt during surgery. It is usually touted as also having skin tightening capabilities, and while I have observed that some of that does occur, it will not solve skin laxity problems where more than an inch of excess skin is present.
No matter what the tool that is being used, the most important element in getting good liposuction results is the experience and skill of the one holding the instrument or device. One of the real negatives to technology (and probably the only one) is that it enables those surgeons of lesser skill or training (and sometimes not a surgeon at all) to look equal to others of extraordinary experience and expertise.
At this time, I would be leary of any device that offers significant fat reduction through some method of external application. While the concept is harmless and certainly appealing, what you really risk is your money. If you are prepared to be dieting and exercising and doing everything to help lose weight anyway, then these device approaches may be reasonable. I suspect they do offer some benefit in the very weight loss conscious patient who is even more motivated by their economic investment. It is probably the ‘coach potatoes’ who make up the greatest percent of failed results with these devices.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: dr barry eppley, indianapolis, laser liposuction, liposuction, plastic surgery, smartlipo
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Monday, April 19th, 2010
Q : I had gastric bypass surgery about six months ago and have already lost 65 lbs. At the pace I am going, I will reach my goal of 100 lbs within one year after surgery. While the weight loss is fantastic, the amount of loose hanging skin that has developed is disgusting. I want to get this loose skin removed as soon as I can. How soon once I reach my weight loss goal can I have plastic surgery?
A: It is understandable that most extreme weight loss patients want to enjoy the benefits from their efforts as soon as possible. While the weight loss is the first step, most patients will require some skin removal through a second stage body contouring surgery to really see the body that they had hoped for.
Despite the enthusiasm of pressing forward as soon as possible, it is important to wait until some point after you have reached your weight loss goal. Your body needs time to recover and adjust to the new weight. This also allows you to learn new eating habits that will help keep the weight off but also have you become more nutritionally sound.
Body contouring surgery places major stress on one’s body and requires a lot of nutrients and energy to heal properly. You also want your immune function to be functioning as best as possible. In short, you don’t want to be malnourished going into major surgery. It has been that many post-bariatric surgery patients have protein-calorie malnutrition as well as various vitamins and mineral deficiencies.
While there is no standard waiting period after bariatric surgery, it is best that one have a stable weight for at least three months before considering elective body contouring surgery. Patients who have had gastric bypass, due to intestinal absorption changes, aren’t usually ready for body contouring surgery for six months or more afterwards. Lapband patients lose weight at a much slower rate and it may be much longer than a year after their procedure before they are ready. Extreme weight loss patients who have done it on their own without surgery can be done sooner because their intestinal absorption of nutrients has not been altered.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: bariatric surgery, body contouring surgery, dr barry eppley, extreme weight loss, indianapolis, plastic surgery
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
Monday, April 19th, 2010
Q: I have one breast that is quite a bit larger than the other one. I am way too embarrassed to wear a bathing suit or even go out with men for more than a couple of weeks. (I don’t let my relationships, go to the next level so to speak, in fear that the guy will totally freak out and embarrass me even more if that is possible because I already feel pretty bad about myself!) Anyway I was wondering if you could enlarge just one of my breasts?
A: While few women have breasts that are perfectly symmetric, congenital or developmental breast asymmetry is another matter. In this condition, one breast is significantly larger than the other often by several cup sizes. In its most severe form, there is a medical condition known as Poland’s syndrome where the breast and the underlying chest muscles on one side fail to develop much at all.
All forms of breast asymmetry can be significantly improved through modern breast surgery methods. In some cases, the smaller breast may be merely enlarged by the placement of a breast implant. In other cases, differential enlargement of the breasts will different implants sizes may be better.
Often times, however, the differences between the breasts is more than just that of volume. The larger or more normal breast will have more skin and a different size and position of the nipple on the breast mound. Optimal correction may require adjustment of the more normal breast as well through a lift or nipple elevation.
Dr. Barry Eppley
Tags: breast asymmetry, breast augmentation, breast implant, breast lift, dr barry eppley, indianapolis, plastic surgery
Posted in Your Questions | No Comments »
|
|
|
|